[Veritas-bu] NBU 6 and changing Linux host name

Hopefully I've explained this as clearly as possible.. We've got 2Linux servers (let's call them Linux1 and Linux2). Linux1 is now to be called Linux 2 and vice versa. Linux 2 is a client (a SAN media server; i.e. it has a storage unit) in Netbackup 6. Once I've made the changes

Re: [Veritas-bu] Generating list of all active clients !!

Jonathan Summary of ALL POLICIES in the GUI shows all the clients you backup! Also BPPLLIST -allpolicies may help - you can (in windows) write out to a .txt file too if you like to extract the info! Hope this is of some help Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain

Re: [Veritas-bu] Are client backups connected to specific polices ?

Title: Message Tim Was a reboot done? on the Server perhaps? Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Wilkinson, Tim

Re: [Veritas-bu] Troubleshooting Guide Question

Jason If it was me in this position (and it isnt!) I would enable BPBKAR and BPBRM logging and where possible find out what the client is doing when performing the backup! I do not know your network environment or your OS, but if I assume the client is Windows, turn off any VSP/VSS open file

Re: [Veritas-bu] Troubleshooting Guide Question

Tend to agree with Simon , im my experience the 10054 error always sways me in investigating the speed/duplex settings on the NIC , saying that 9/10 something to do with the network. Regards Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.0 Licensing

Title: RE: NetBackup 6.0 Licensing A customer with NetBackup 5.x licenses purchased from Sun and a support agreement also purchased by Sun has received the following reply from Sun Licensing: If the customer is running 5.1 it should be no problem. 5.x licenses will enable the 6.0 Netbackup

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.0 Licensing

Title: RE: NetBackup 6.0 Licensing You dont need new licenses to work with NetBackup 6 if you dont want the new features of NetBackup. Im using a 3.4 key and it is working perfectly. But if you want to enable some of the new features you have to get a new license. (this wasnt needed for

Re: [Veritas-bu] Duplicates in bpmedialist.

Are you saying you have two media with the same barcode label? Nope (at least I don't think so). I believe there is one media and it had been allocated by different media servers at different times (at some point in the past). (Maybe someone deassigned it instead of expiring it?) I've had

[Veritas-bu] new client is getting connection refused on 5.1

I recently upgraded our master server to netbackup 5.1mp5 on solaris. We moved a client to new hardware and instead of moving over the netbackup stuff we installed 5.1 client. Backups fail, and i can't look at client properties in jnbSA because it times out. The firewall is open and both boxes

Re: [Veritas-bu] want to give a normal user to monitor netbackup

* Shyingyih Huang \( ?q \) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-21 10:05]: Hi: You can edit the /usr/openv/java/auth.conf Example : opmgr ADMIN=AM Ps: opmgr is end-user Yes, but if they have access to the Activity Monitor, they have FULL access to it, including the ability to kill active jobs.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Troubleshooting Guide Question

I did some further digging in client logs, once I enabled them and re-ran, and found that it was caused by MS VSP being disabled. Resetting to manual fixed the issue. Thanks, jason -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 3:58 AM

[Veritas-bu] Advanced Reporter in 5.1 = 6.0 NOM?

All, I am trying to see if the old Advanced Reporter Option (ARO) in Netbackup 4.5, 5.0, and 5.1 equate to NOM in the 6.0 versioning, and if so, does it require a separate license? Regards, Steve Bally Systems Engineer RadiSys Corporation www.radisys.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Desk:

Re: [Veritas-bu] new client is getting connection refused on 5.1

* Steven L. Sesar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-21 17:05]: If you want to connect to the client from the master server GUI, you'll need port 13722 opened up. If you're trying to backup up through a firewall, I suggest that you use vnetd, which requires that you open up port 13724. for basic

Re: [Veritas-bu] Advanced Reporter in 5.1 = 6.0 NOM?

On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:15:28PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to see if the old Advanced Reporter Option (ARO) in Netbackup 4.5, 5.0, and 5.1 equate to NOM in the 6.0 versioning, and if so, does it require a separate license? No, they're not the same product, and no, NOM does

[Veritas-bu] System State Windows 2003 just taking forever

Anyone experienced a System State job stream that seems to just take forever on certain hosts? I can run the job manually on demand with no problem but sometime the scheduled job takes forever. The other partitions seem to be captured normally. Just random system states just go on and on and on