cpreston wrote:
>
> > I am still waiting for someone to report > 250 MiB/s with RHEL3/4/5
> >
> using
>
> > 10GBps NICs.
> >
>
> I'm waiting for anyone to report > 250 MB/s on any platform. ;)
>
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.
>I am still waiting for someone to report > 250 MiB/s with RHEL3/4/5
using
>10GBps NICs.
I'm waiting for anyone to report > 250 MB/s on any platform. ;)
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Curtis Preston wrote:
>> If it's the card I'm thinking about the TCP checksum is already offload
>> to hardware. In fact most gigaswift cards support this today with 1
> Gbit
>> technology.
>
> Offloading the checksum is not the same as a full TCP offload. A "true"
> TOE ca
Nick said:
>On one of our media servers, I can receive 250 MB/s into my 6850 with
>4 GigE connections bonded into two LACP bonds,
Edson said:
>All of server reach a peak of around 2-2.5 Gbps (250-300 MB/s). Using
iperf, >we could reach 3 Gbps using NC510F; unfortunately, it seems that
the 64-bit
>If it's the card I'm thinking about the TCP checksum is already offload
>to hardware. In fact most gigaswift cards support this today with 1
Gbit
>technology.
Offloading the checksum is not the same as a full TCP offload. A "true"
TOE card offloads ALL TCP processing, not just the checksum.
>I
Hi
I have 3 media servers running with a 10 GbE NIC (alll running RHEL4). Two
of them use a
Intel NIC, and the other uses a NC-510F (NetXen chipset). We use 3
different server models:
a Sun V40Z, a IBM x366 and a HP DL580 g4. On my opinion, Intel(or AMD)+Linux
machines
have a so much better cost/
24, 2007 3:23 PM
> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Curtis Preston
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 10GB network + perf questions etc
>
> On one of our media servers, I can receive 250 MB/s into my 6850 with
> 4 GigE connections bonded into two LACP bonds, stream that out to six
> fc LTO-3
400
> From: "Curtis Preston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 10GB network + perf questions etc
> To: "Dominik Pietrzykowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> Message-ID:
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type:
From: "Curtis Preston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 10GB network + perf questions etc
> To: "Dominik Pietrzykowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type:
er Marelas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Preston
Sent: Friday, 24 August 2007 3:43 PM
To: Dominik Pietrzykowski; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 10GB network + perf questions etc
Check out my blog entry on this t
nologies
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dominik
Pietrzykowski
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:42 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] 10GB network + perf questions etc
Hi Group,
Just curious to know if any
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 1:18 AM
To: Dominik Pietrzykowski
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 10GB network + perf questions etc
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Dominik Pietrzykowski wrote
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Dominik Pietrzykowski wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Group,
>
> Just curious to know if anyone is using 10GB network (fibre/copper, is
> copper available yet at 10GB ???) on their media servers or clients and what
> sort of data transfer rates are they getting ???
>
> I'm waiting for my
Hi Group,
Just curious to know if anyone is using 10GB network (fibre/copper, is
copper available yet at 10GB ???) on their media servers or clients and what
sort of data transfer rates are they getting ???
I'm waiting for my 10GB blade for the switch to come from the US, it's
taking ages
14 matches
Mail list logo