Okay all… I have a received a few “inquiries” on the
new web site and most of what I’m getting isn’t good. I’ve
also read through most of the entries here, and I’m also not getting warm
fuzzies on the site..
So here’s what I would like to ask of you.. I have the ear of the folks in cha
* support site
http://www.commvault.com/backup_and_recovery.asp ???
-Jonathan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greenberg, Katherine A
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006
9:45 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] The
*NEW
ROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne T
Smith
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:34 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] The *NEW* support site
I wasn't too fond of the old Veritas site, but the Symantec NetBackup
site is way beyond functional.
I wasn't too fond of the old Veritas site, but the Symantec NetBackup
site is way beyond functional. If customers don't demand better than
the v6.0 debacle and this dysfunctional support site, why should
Symantec change?
Grinding salt into the wound, "Veritas" sent me their monthly URL to the
@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] The *NEW* support site
OK, So, is it just me or does the latest re-design of the support site suck more than any previous BAD incarnation of the support site?
Anyone know of a backdoor to get into the OLD support.veritas.com site? Or are we seriously now going to be
n.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] The *NEW*
support site
OK, So, is it just me or does the latest re-design of the support
site suck more than any previous BAD incarnation of the support site?
Anyone know of a backdoor to get into the OLD
support.veritas.com site? Or are we seriousl
http://www.commvault.com/backup_and_recovery.asp ???
-Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Greenberg, Katherine ASent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:45
AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re:
[Veritas-bu] The *NEW* support site
Well, since
http://support.veritas.com/menu_ddProduct_NBUESVR.htm
If you are fast enough
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greenberg, Katherine A
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006
10:46 PM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] The *NEW
ubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] The
*NEW* support site
Kate
Well had
a quick glance, and yes its pants !!!
Dont be
mad though :-(
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain
Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited,
B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3
Message-From: Greenberg,
Katherine A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 November 2006
20:46To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject:
[Veritas-bu] The *NEW* support site
OK, So, is it
just me or does the latest re-design of the support site suck more than any
previous BAD
01 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] The *NEW* support site
On 11/13/2006 2:45 PM, Greenberg, Katherine A wrote:
> OK, So, is it just me or does the latest re-design of the support site
> suck more than any previous BAD incarnation of the support site?
It really, really sucks. The search
Hi Kate,
Yes, it is the worst approach in search design there is!
Lets you and I have con call with Ron Greenwood and the new SLC Sales Rep
sometime next week.
Scott J.
>>> "Greenberg, Katherine A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/13/2006 1:45 PM >>>
OK, So, is it just me or does the latest re-design of
On 11/13/2006 2:45 PM, Greenberg, Katherine A wrote:
> OK, So, is it just me or does the latest re-design of the support site
> suck more than any previous BAD incarnation of the support site?
It really, really sucks. The search engine is now as bad as HP's (and
believe or not, the HP support f
OK, So, is it just
me or does the latest re-design of the support site suck more than any previous
BAD incarnation of the support site?
Anyone know of a
backdoor to get into the OLD support.veritas.com site? Or are we seriously now
going to be forced into the Symantec model --- fi
14 matches
Mail list logo
