We found this out all on our own, without Symantec's blessing.
They came a little late with their 2008 R2 support, so they let this go on
for CYA. We were doing this before we went to 7.0.1.
When you are caught in the dilemma of getting backups or being supported,
well, I choose the former.
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this
We found this out all on our own, without Symantec's blessing.
They came a little late with their 2008 R2 support, so they let this go
on for CYA. We were doing this before we went to 7.0.1.
When you
Sent: 05 May 2011 15:33
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this
We found this out all on our own, without Symantec's blessing.
They came a little late with their 2008 R2 support, so they let this go on for
CYA. We were doing
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this
Well, it is not supported but is working.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 6:04 PM
]
Sent: 05 May 2011 18:43
To: rusty.ma...@sungard.com
Cc: WEAVER, Simon (external); smpt; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this
The problem with NetBackup is that it supports a greater
Good Afternoon,
It would be nice if Symantec could design the client to master interface to be
more generic, without hurting performance.
Put the smarts for handling client differences in the client and not on the
master.
Then they should be able to handle not only newer client support needs
Re: Sure I read somewhere this was bad practice, but for life of me cant
find it!
Probably saw this in the release notes on mixed-server compatibility
environments. 7.1 release notes page 41. Suspect it id doc’d in other versions
of Release notes also. I didn’t check.
■ In a
