i think it can be wedged while also being separated.
an example would be a google search where you are presented with top youtube
video results first.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:10 AM, @sull
> >
> wrote:
> > Does anyone think that at this
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:10 AM, @sull wrote:
> Does anyone think that at this point YouTube/Google should just start a new
> site (company) specifically for Pro Content (professionally produced
> entertainment) and just promote the hell out of it on Youtube.com and
> various other Google owned s
Yes, and they're missing out on a business channel too.
http://www.jimkukral.com/how-youtube-is-missing-out-on-12-billion-a-year-by-not-having-a-business-channel/
Jim Kukral
2220 Superior Viaduct, Suite 3
Cleveland, OH 44113
j...@jimkukral.com
http://www.jimkukral.com
http://www.connectwithji
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:10 PM, @sull wrote:
> Does anyone think that at this point YouTube/Google should just start a new
> site (company) specifically for Pro Content (professionally produced
> entertainment) and just promote the hell out of it on Youtube.com and
> various other Google owned si
I have always hated arbitrary "pro" "user/amateur" categories. Its a
continuum, not two groups, and a nonlinear continuum at that.
So while I see your point, I hope for things going AWAY from further
categorization of this type.
--
___
Brook H
Does anyone think that at this point YouTube/Google should just start a new
site (company) specifically for Pro Content (professionally produced
entertainment) and just promote the hell out of it on Youtube.com and
various other Google owned sites/pages?
Let YouTube continue to be the "Broadcast Yo
