The shift will be faster than people think b/c of the demographics of online
video (the coveted 18-34 year-old crowd). It is common sense really - when
was the last time you heard a 20-something year-old talk about a TV show?
The buzz and chatter is all about online video, social networks, etc..
Hey Bill,
Long time no see. How's it going?
On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Bill Cammack wrote:
> I seriously don't know why people expect videos about uninteresting
> (except to "the audience of ten") topics to EVER be monetized.
sometimes things are of interest to an audience larger than exp
That's a zillion times *more* interesting than most monetized video.
Brook
On 8/2/07, pouringdownpix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> never YET? never EVER?
>
> "uninteresting" videoblog monetized, if only for a moment:
>
> http://pouringdown.tv/?p=161
>
> --
>
> daniel, pouringdown.tv
>
(late reply)
I think one day people will be shooting / making video / media as stringers
and sell that to people who need video / media, likely businesses who can
afford to pay. another layer to news program's stringers/freelancers but on
any topic, not just news. ala Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash.
oh, also, which is why I think ads on videos is an old media way of
thinking. like ads on tv. (which will phase into product placements
soon enough). people will still use them now whilst they make money
from them but I don't think they'll be necessary or used in future as
they'll be regarded as sp
