Mikkel Krøigård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Citat Martin Geisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I have already made a script which uses SSH to start any number
>> of playes here on DAIMI, and I've used it to test up to 25
>> players (it took 15 ms on average for a 32-bit passively secure
>> m
Mikkel Krøigård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually upon reading my own email I realized that I forgot to
> mention the added bonus of having real internet communication going
> on if we have machines outside DAIMI involved in the testing.
>
> Martin, could you buy a dozen computers and set the
Actually upon reading my own email I realized that I forgot to mention the added
bonus of having real internet communication going on if we have machines outside
DAIMI involved in the testing.
Martin, could you buy a dozen computers and set them up in various locations
around the world? :)
___
Martin Geisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have just talked with Thomas about how to benchmark VIFF and what we
> should try measuring. We found it difficult to come up with good
> answers, so now we ask here.
>
> We talked about the goals of benchmarking:
>
> * Determine bot
Hi Martin,
I think that looking at the two bottlenecks as suggested is a very good idea and
should have the highest priority. We don't know nearly enough about how much
time Python in general and Twisted in particular is stealing from us. In
principle, we could be in a situation where it is hopele
Citat Martin Geisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have already made a script which uses SSH to start any number of
> playes here on DAIMI, and I've used it to test up to 25 players (it
> took 15 ms on average for a 32-bit passively secure multiplication,
> and 19 ms for an actively secure one)
Hi everybody,
I have just talked with Thomas about how to benchmark VIFF and what we
should try measuring. We found it difficult to come up with good
answers, so now we ask here.
We talked about the goals of benchmarking:
* Determine bottle-necks. It wont do us any good if the carefull
optimiz
160 bit
--
Janus
Den 21/09/2008 kl. 17.02 skrev Claudio Orlandi:
Could everyone specify the size of the field and the size of the
secret keys used?
Otherwise it's quite hard to understand the performance reported.
Regards,
Claudio
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Adam Langley
<[EMAIL PROT
