Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 6/18/06, Mikolaj Machowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dnia niedziela, 18 czerwca 2006 12:00, Yakov Lerner napisał:
> vim unserstands \t and \n in [] in regexp (as tab and as newline).
>
> But \s is not treated as blanks in []. Can you please add
> treatment of \s as blanks
On 6/18/06, Mikolaj Machowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dnia niedziela, 18 czerwca 2006 12:00, Yakov Lerner napisał:
> vim unserstands \t and \n in [] in regexp (as tab and as newline).
>
> But \s is not treated as blanks in []. Can you please add
> treatment of \s as blanks in [] in regexp. I m
Dnia niedziela, 18 czerwca 2006 12:00, Yakov Lerner napisał:
> vim unserstands \t and \n in [] in regexp (as tab and as newline).
>
> But \s is not treated as blanks in []. Can you please add
> treatment of \s as blanks in [] in regexp. I mean, \s is sort of
> space and Tab, no more complex than th
vim unserstands \t and \n in [] in regexp (as tab and as newline).
But \s is not treated as blanks in []. Can you please add
treatment of \s as blanks in [] in regexp. I mean, \s is sort of
space and Tab, no more complex than that, no ?
Thanks
Yakov
