diff --git a/runtime/ftplugin/reva.vim b/runtime/ftplugin/reva.vim
index 05c8bc325..cf90ff82c 100644
--- a/runtime/ftplugin/reva.vim
+++ b/runtime/ftplugin/reva.vim
@@ -23,3 +23,5 @@ setlocal com=s1:/*,mb:*,ex:*/,:\|,:\\
setlocal fo=tcrqol
setlocal matchpairs+=\::;
setlocal iskeyword=!,@,33-35,%
Changes to the existing 8th syntax and ftplugin files:
diff --git a/runtime/ftplugin/8th.vim b/runtime/ftplugin/8th.vim
index 14301187d..60a7b0cb4 100644
--- a/runtime/ftplugin/8th.vim
+++ b/runtime/ftplugin/8th.vim
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
" Vim ftplugin file
" Language: 8th
" Version: any
-" Last Chan
Hi Bram,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:41 PM Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
>
> Yegappan wrote:
>
> > If an empty string argument is passed to the getreg(), getreginfo() and
> > getregtype() functions, then the unnamed register is used. A minor
> > update to the help text is attached to document this.
>
>
Hello,
Its been brought to my attention (thanks, Naruhiko Nishino) that vim's
heredoc's syntax highlighting may not need to support commenting, either
old-style or vim9 style. Some of the examples show vimL use, where
comment support is nice, but other examples are just plain text. I'm
leanin
Yegappan wrote:
> If an empty string argument is passed to the getreg(), getreginfo() and
> getregtype() functions, then the unnamed register is used. A minor
> update to the help text is attached to document this.
I'll include it, thanks.
Somehow the patch had spaces instead of tabs. I appli
Patch 8.2.3450
Problem:Coveralls action fails.
Solution: Disable it for now.
Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml
*** ../vim-8.2.3449/.github/workflows/ci.yml2021-06-22 18:21:15.538967726
+0200
--- .github/workflows/ci.yml2021-09-19 17:54:19.072219350 +0200
***
*** 20
Hi,
If an empty string argument is passed to the getreg(), getreginfo() and
getregtype() functions, then the unnamed register is used. A minor
update to the help text is attached to document this.
- Yegappan
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type you
Patch 8.2.3449
Problem:Sort fails if the sort compare function returns 999.
Solution: Adjust value to -1 / 0 / 1. (Yasuhiro Matsumoto, closes #8884)
Files: src/list.c, src/testdir/test_sort.vim
*** ../vim-8.2.3448/src/list.c 2021-09-11 20:20:34.007127618 +0200
--- src/list.c 2021-0