I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which format
interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
Thanks,
Marten
--
Check out the System 6 Heaven:
http://www.euronet.nl/users/mvdk/system_6_heaven.html
Subscribe to the LEM system6 list
At 23:40 +0200 on 04/09/01, Marten van de Kraats wrote:
>I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which format
>interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
Won't matter, especially if it's a fast HD, because the HD's own buffer
will take care of any issues that m
>At 23:40 +0200 on 04/09/01, Marten van de Kraats wrote:
>
>>I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which format
>>interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
>
>Won't matter, especially if it's a fast HD, because the HD's own buffer
>will take care
--- Marten van de Kraats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which
> format
> interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
1:1 interleave is fine for all Macs except the Plus
and SE. The Plus normally uses 3:1 and the SE 2:1
but that isn't
Marten from the Kraats wrote:
>I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which format
>interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
I have no direct answer to your question. But, since the concept
of "interleave" perplexed me for so many years... I thought I'd toss
in
