Daniel Kiper writes:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 04:15:48AM -0800, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
>>
>> Is this for when the hypervisor crashes and we want a crash dump of
>> that?
>
> dom0 at boot gets some info about kexec/kdump configuration from Xen
> hypervisor
> (e.g. placement of crash kernel
Add RFS support to virtio network device.
Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS for this feature, a new
configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of
virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RFS to program
packet steering for unidirectional protocols.
---
Chan
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:51:08AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 10:37 +, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >>> On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > > The crash region (as specified by crashkernel= on the
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:51:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.11.12 at 11:37, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> > On 23/11/2012 01:38, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> >> I still don't
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 09:56 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.11.12 at 18:37, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> > I actually talked to Ian Jackson at LCE, and mentioned among other
That was me actually (this happens surprisingly often ;-)).
> > things the bogosity of requiring a PUD page for three-
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 10:37 +, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > The crash region (as specified by crashkernel= on the Xen command line)
> > > is isolated from dom0.
> > >[...]
> >
> > But
>>> On 23.11.12 at 11:37, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> > On 23/11/2012 01:38, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> >> I still don't really get why it can't be isolated from dom0, which would
>> > make m
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 23/11/2012 01:38, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> I still don't really get why it can't be isolated from dom0, which would
> > make more sense to me, even for a Xen crash.
> >>
> >
> > T
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 04:15:48AM -0800, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
> Daniel Kiper writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:40:39AM -0800, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
> >> Daniel Kiper writes:
> >>
> >> > Some kexec/kdump implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use default
> >> > functions
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:17:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
...
> "specifying the number of the last transmit and receive queue that
> is going to be used; thus out of transmitq0..transmitqn and
> receiveq0..receiveqn where n=virtqueue_pairs will be used."
>
> In this description, looks like n+1
>>> On 22.11.12 at 18:37, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> I actually talked to Ian Jackson at LCE, and mentioned among other
> things the bogosity of requiring a PUD page for three-level paging in
> Linux -- a bogosity which has spread from Xen into native. It's a page
> wasted for no good reason, s
>>> On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 23/11/2012 01:38, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> I still don't really get why it can't be isolated from dom0, which would
> make more sense to me, even for a Xen crash.
>>
>
> The crash region (as specified by crashkernel= on the Xen command line)
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
