On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:41:17PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 04.01.13 at 15:22, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > >> /sbin/kexec can load the "Xen" crash kernel its
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 04:12:32PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.01.13 at 16:15, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:34:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 27.12.12 at 03:18, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >> > Some implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use part of ident
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:41:17PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.01.13 at 15:22, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> /sbin/kexec can load the "Xen" crash kernel itself by issuing
> >> hypercalls using /dev/xen/privcmd. This would rem
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:38:44PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/01/13 14:22, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 27/12/12 18:02, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>> Andrew Cooper writes:
> >>>
> On 27/12/2012 07:53, Eric W. Biederman
>>> On 04.01.13 at 16:15, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:34:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 27.12.12 at 03:18, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> > Some implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use part of identity page
> table
>> > to construct transition page table. It means t
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:34:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 27.12.12 at 03:18, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > Some implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use part of identity page
> > table
> > to construct transition page table. It means that they require separate
> > PUDs,
> > PMDs and
>>> On 04.01.13 at 15:22, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> /sbin/kexec can load the "Xen" crash kernel itself by issuing
>> hypercalls using /dev/xen/privcmd. This would remove the need for
>> the dom0 kernel to distinguish between loading a
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 14:22 +, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 27/12/12 18:02, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >Andrew Cooper writes:
> > >
> > >>On 27/12/2012 07:53, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >>>The syscall ABI still has the wrong se
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:22:57PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 27/12/12 18:02, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >Andrew Cooper writes:
> > >
> > >>On 27/12/2012 07:53, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >>>The syscall ABI still has the w
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:26:43AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 27/12/12 18:02, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >Andrew Cooper writes:
> >
> >>On 27/12/2012 07:53, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>>The syscall ABI still has the wrong semantics.
> >>>
> >>>Aka totally unmaintainable and umergeable.
> >>
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:59:27PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 03:19:24PM -0800, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > Hmm... this code is being redone at the moment... this might conflict.
> >
> > Is this available somewhere? May I have a look at it?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-k
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:06:13PM -0800, ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
> Daniel Kiper writes:
>
> >> Daniel Kiper writes:
> >>
> >> > Some kexec/kdump implementations (e.g. Xen PVOPS) could not use default
> >> > Linux infrastructure and require some support from firmware and/or
> >> > hyperviso
12 matches
Mail list logo
