On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:41 PM Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 5/26/21 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > There are currently two cases where we poll TX vq not in response to a
> > callback: start xmit and rx napi. We currently do this with callbacks
> > enabled which can cause
Hi Michael,
On 5/26/21 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
There are currently two cases where we poll TX vq not in response to a
callback: start xmit and rx napi. We currently do this with callbacks
enabled which can cause extra interrupts from the card. Used not to be
a big issue as we run
在 2021/5/26 下午4:24, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
There are currently two cases where we poll TX vq not in response to a
callback: start xmit and rx napi. We currently do this with callbacks
enabled which can cause extra interrupts from the card. Used not to be
a big issue as we run with interrupts
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:15 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/26/21 10:24 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > There are currently two cases where we poll TX vq not in response to a
> > callback: start xmit and rx napi. We currently do this with callbacks
> > enabled which can cause extra
On 5/26/21 10:24 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> There are currently two cases where we poll TX vq not in response to a
> callback: start xmit and rx napi. We currently do this with callbacks
> enabled which can cause extra interrupts from the card. Used not to be
> a big issue as we run with
There are currently two cases where we poll TX vq not in response to a
callback: start xmit and rx napi. We currently do this with callbacks
enabled which can cause extra interrupts from the card. Used not to be
a big issue as we run with interrupts disabled but that is no longer the
case, and
