As recently as last summer, it looked like our sun had gone into a sleep
mode.
http://www.space.com/11960-fading-sunspots-slower-solar-activity-solar-cycle
.html
If you are new to Vortex, you may not realize that we have a unwanted and
powerful neighbor in the galaxy named Eta Carinae. It is star
On 02/12/2012 02:47 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
As recently as last summer, it looked like our sun had gone into a sleep
mode.
http://www.space.com/11960-fading-sunspots-slower-solar-activity-solar-cycle
.html
If you are new to Vortex, you may not realize that we have a unwanted and
powerful neighbor
-Original Message-
Hi Mauro,
But the "experts" have been consistently wrong of late! No one predicted the
recent surge, nor the prior lull of the previous year. And no one that I can
find has tied the more massive spots to EC. Are you defending this sloppy
record? NASA is the worst of all
I'll perform a power spectral density analysis of sunspot number/solar
activity data. If there's a 5.52 year cycle in solar activity,
it'll show up, along with the main 11 year cycle. I don't think
something that big can be easily overlooked,
but nevertheless... it bodes well with my modest attem
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Anyway - let's hope it does not keel-over on us later this year... but...
> yes, to answer a lingering question - methinks the Maya would surely have
> been aware of Eta Carinae and its regular cycle.
>
> On occasion, it can be the brightest
On 02/12/2012 10:33 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
I'll perform a power spectral density analysis of sunspot number/solar
activity data. If there's a 5.52 year cycle in solar activity,
it'll show up, along with the main 11 year cycle. I don't think
something that big can be easily overlooked,
but neverthe
Impressive! You take this quite seriously Mauro.
This is actually a lot more complicated than it seems at first glance.
Probably because the 11 year cycle is not really exact, but the statistical
arguments are hard for me to follow. You have to wonder how accurate older
data is as well.
Is
On 02/20/2012 10:29 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Impressive! You take this quite seriously Mauro.
Not so seriously, really. I took it as an opportunity to learn new
things. And your hypothesis looked both interesting and appropriate.
This is actually a lot more complicated than it seems at first
Most readers on this list are more concerned with anomalous energy on earth
than astrophysics. We pay attention to solar energy as a clean alternative -
and to solar sunspots as a general areas of interest - but hardly ever do we
consider an interconnectivity of solar activity to LENR in hidden way
On 02/26/2012 06:58 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Most readers on this list are more concerned with anomalous energy on earth
than astrophysics. We pay attention to solar energy as a clean alternative -
and to solar sunspots as a general areas of interest - but hardly ever do we
consider an interconnect
Jones.
FYI: " And if we add another piece to the puzzle, remember that a
curious character who writes about JONP (W. Guglinski), which according
to some items found in a theoretical way the catalyst for Rossi,
suggests that the excess heat of LENR (currently unexplained ) are to be
connected
11 matches
Mail list logo