> 13188 is already merged.
13186 fails consistently locally too, investigating.
I think this was introduced with a98346f664aae148d26a8e158008b773d73db96f
Cheers,
Ole
>
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Ed Kern via
> Lists.Fd.Io
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 12:07 PM
> To: Jan Gelety -
13188 is already merged.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Ed Kern via
Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 12:07 PM
To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] VPP make test gives false positive
Importance: High
Hey,
responding because I dont see one from klement.
looks like he has two gerrits pending
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13188/
to fix broken interfaces.. (this passed verification so trying to get this one
merged)
and
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13186/
for the retries in error..this is not pas
Teshigawara-san,
the "vat# acl_add_replace ipv4 permit" part in your configuration is
not doing anything, since it configures a new ACL in the ACL plugin,
and both of the features you are trying to configure are using
classifier tables.
As for why they do not work together - I would suggest debug
Hi, Vratko-san,
Thank you for your quick answer.
I'll give it a try!
Satomi.
On 2018/06/21 20:10, Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at
Cisco) wrote:
VPP rx/tx counter is 0
Last time I have seen this behavior,
it was caused by insufficient value of
mem-mbufs [1] parameter.
The
Dear VPP team,
The password of the zip file
(20180621_VPP behaivor of over performance limit.zip) is here.
⇒hSH$GAC*ZSCO
On 2018/06/22 15:48, 井上里美 wrote:
Dear VPP team
Thank you for your response.
I'm sorry.
I'll send the file one more time.
Best regards,
Satomi Inoue
PHONE:+81 422-5
Hello,
VPP make test gives false positive results at the moment - there are cca 110
tests failed but build is marked successful.
The last correct run on ubuntu is [1].
The first false positive run on ubutnu is [2] - trigerred by Florin's patch [3].
It seems that the first failing test is test_
Dear all,
Let me ask about the classify function.
For incoming packets from GE0/5/0 interface at vpp-1 in attached png, I'd like
to do below:
1. apply the rate limit by Policer,
2. then, apply the policy based routing by ACL and packets are sent to vpp-3
directly.
(packets which source a
