I'm trying to see if it's worth porting AF_XDP PMD mode back to a version of
DPDK that works with VPP that still implements the HQoS
From: Damjan Marion
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2021 3:14
To: Catalin Vasile
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] [DPDK]
Probably nobody tried, and knowing that vpp doesn’t use dpdk buffer manager, i
would be very surprised if it works.
What is wrong with using VPP native AF_XDP?
—
Damjan
> On 15.05.2021., at 01:26, Catalin Vasile wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I know VPP has an AF_XDP plugin, but I'm trying to use
Hi,
I know VPP has an AF_XDP plugin, but I'm trying to use the AF_XDP PMD driver
from DPDK.
It's not clear to me: does VPP have a way to use the DPDK AF_XDP PMD driver? I
tried looking through the code, but I'm not sure yet.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this
Hi all,
When I create a GRE tunnel using the API, and then try to look at an API
trace to see exactly how it was added, the gre_tunnel_add_del message
requesting the tunnel creation does not show up in the output. Neither do
subsequent gre_tunnel_dump messages. The tunnels are successfully
Hi Dave,
I started out saying that I think this is a valuable change. That being
said, this is going to have implications for folks.
Sometimes concrete examples help. I did not have to look far.
Here is code from VOM. Yes, it is deprecated, but it is an example for
folks to follow.
/**
* A
