e 05, 2020 11:51 AM
To: m...@ciena.com<mailto:m...@ciena.com>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp #vnet apparent buffer prefetch issue - seeing "l3
mac mismatch" discards
Have you tried to use "git bisect" to find which pa
May be it is this one? https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/26961 -John
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via
lists.fd.io
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2020 11:51 AM
To: m...@ciena.com
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp #vnet apparent buffer prefetch issue - seeing &qu
gt; -Mike
>
> From: Andrew đź‘˝ Yourtchenko
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2020 10:58 AM
> To: ayour...@gmail.com
> Cc: Bly, Mike ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp #vnet apparent buffer prefetch
> issue - seeing "l3 mac mismatch" discards
>
Yeah, it did not cherry pick clean for me either as it needs a line # change.
-Mike
From: Andrew đź‘˝ Yourtchenko
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2020 10:58 AM
To: ayour...@gmail.com
Cc: Bly, Mike ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp #vnet apparent buffer prefetch issue
Ah sorry, didn’t see your reply. I’ll take a look. It doesn’t appear to
cherry-pick cleanly to stable/1908, so it probably was among those that 500 :(
--a
> On 5 Jun 2020, at 19:54, Andrew Yourtchenko via lists.fd.io
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Any chances you might do “git bisect” on this ?
Hi Mike,
Any chances you might do “git bisect” on this ? Should take about 8-9
iterations I suppose...
You could use v20.01-rc0 label as the “git bisect bad” start and the v20.09-rc0
as the “git bisect good” start.
I am currently working on integrating a bunch of “fix” commits that happened
b
-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp #vnet apparent buffer prefetch issue
- seeing "l3 mac mismatch" discards
Have you tried to use "git bisect" to find which patch fixes this issue?
—
Damjan
On 4 Jun 2020, at 22:15, Bly, Mike via lists.fd.io
Have you tried to use "git bisect" to find which patch fixes this issue?
—
Damjan
> On 4 Jun 2020, at 22:15, Bly, Mike via lists.fd.io
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are observing a small percentage of frames being discarded in simple
> 2-port L2 xconnect setup when a constant, same frame, sin
Hello,
We are observing a small percentage of frames being discarded in simple 2-port
L2 xconnect setup when a constant, same frame, single (full duplex) traffic
profile is offered to the system. The frames are being discarded due to a
failed VLAN classification when all frames offered have the