On Wednesday 08 September 2004 23:04, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote: > > - classification (when is a patch stable) really depends > > on the feedback from the community, no feedback might > > be mistaken as good stability ... > > - stable branch and release candidates will only get bugfixes, > > no feature additions (feature freeze) > > ... and btw, the rc2 for 2.4.27: Has there been any reports on this > one yet, except from those on the list? > It has been a rc for a long time now, maybe it is time to "rebrand" > it as the newest stable release for the 2.4 kernel? > > Best regards > Tor Rune Skoglund > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My low loaded machine is now up for: 12:21:34 up 28 days, 1:29, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.08 Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 11 20:28:34 CEST 2004 vservers are on lv's with reiserfs + chris masons data logging patches + daily snapshots for backups. No single problem during service. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote that he'd try it on some heavy loaded machines, but I have not heard anything about it since then. -- lg, Chris _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
