Hi,
On 22 November 2016 at 09:41, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:06:00 + Daniel Stone wrote:
>> Thanks for this - it's a good point. It's strengthened my resolve a
>> little bit though, especially in the context of
>>
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:06:00 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On 22 November 2016 at 08:54, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:41:33 + Daniel Stone
> > wrote:
> >> On 2 May 2016 at 22:40, Emmanuel
Hi Pekka,
On 22 November 2016 at 08:54, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:41:33 + Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 2 May 2016 at 22:40, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
>> wrote:
>> The core already has to deal with
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:41:33 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> On 2 May 2016 at 22:40, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
> wrote:
> > Introduces a “same-as” configuration option for each output, which
> > bypasses the rest of the output
Hi Emmanuel,
On 2 May 2016 at 22:40, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
wrote:
> Introduces a “same-as” configuration option for each output, which
> bypasses the rest of the output configuration (mode, scale, transform
> and seat) and instead makes it a clone of the specified
Introduces a “same-as” configuration option for each output, which
bypasses the rest of the output configuration (mode, scale, transform
and seat) and instead makes it a clone of the specified output.
This is implemented by splitting the drm_output struct into the
per-connector drm_output and the