> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Spilsbury [mailto:smspil...@gmail.com]
>>
>>
>>
> Ah interesting. I guess the point of the tests is to verify the
> backends themselves as opposed to testing the core compositor (well,
> it tests that as an incident, but I guess its not the point?). Does it
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Eoff, Ullysses A
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sam Spilsbury [mailto:smspil...@gmail.com]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> Yes, it would be trivial to enable the input-based tests to run on the
> headless backend... however, it's unclear to me whether the headl
iginal Message-
>>> > From: wayland-devel-
>>> bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> > [mailto:wayland-devel-
>>> > bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Sam
>>> > Spilsbury
>>> &
f,
>> Ullysses A
>> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:24 PM
>> To: Sam Spilsbury; wayland
>> Subject: RE: [RFC] [tests] Running the wayland tests against
>> compositor-headless
>>
>> Changing the tests to run headless is probably not necessary...
>>
>
>
am Spilsbury; wayland
> Subject: RE: [RFC] [tests] Running the wayland tests against
> compositor-headless
>
> Changing the tests to run headless is probably not necessary...
>
To clarify... I only meant this in the context of the weston-tests-env script ,
i.e.
it does not need to be
uous integration server.
U. Artie Eoff
> -Original Message-
> From: wayland-devel-bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel@lists.freedesktop.org
> [mailto:wayland-devel-
> bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Sam
> Spilsbury
> Sent: Monday, April 22
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a work-item that's already in-progress by
somebody. I noticed that weston has a "headless" compositor backend
and a "no-op" renderer, which effectively do not depend on having
OpenGL or *a* windowing system available at the time that weston is
run.
It would be really g
