Clark C. Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:27:01AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> | > If you're worried about "featurebloat" have you even looked at
> | > the 190 line headers.py? I rest my case.
> |
> | What case? It's totally reasonable code implementing a fairly complete
> | mapping
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:27:01AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| > If you're worried about "featurebloat" have you even looked at
| > the 190 line headers.py? I rest my case.
|
| What case? It's totally reasonable code implementing a fairly complete
| mapping API. Smells similar to rfc822.py
On 2/15/06, Clark C. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:26:41AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> | So we disagree fundamentally -- IMO sometimes a toy is right for the
> | standard library
>
> I'm seriously surprised to hear this. What other standard library items
> are "
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:26:41AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| On 2/14/06, Clark C. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| > | There are many different ways to judge "production quality". If we're
| > | talking about correct, (s
On 2/14/06, Clark C. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> | There are many different ways to judge "production quality". If we're
> | talking about correct, (standards-compliant, even) code, I wholly
> | agree.
>
> Fantastic. I just
On 2/15/06, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HTTPS is orthogonal. Besides, how would you support it in the stdlib? It's
> currently not possible to write an SSL server in Python without a third-party
> library. Maybe someone would be interested in rectifying /that/? :)
Yes, wh
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:39:03AM -0500, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
| On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:50:11 -0500, "Clark C. Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| >On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| >
| >| My gut feeling: Ignores many parts of the WSGI spec (sendfile, strict
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:50:11 -0500, "Clark C. Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>| My gut feeling: Ignores many parts of the WSGI spec (sendfile, strict
>| error checking), supports unnecessary stuff for stdlib, i.e. Continue
>| s
