On 13 January 2011 12:02, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 02:52 PM 1/12/2011 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Alice BevanMcGregor
>> wrote:
>> > On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said:
>> >>
>> >> Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this,
At 02:52 PM 1/12/2011 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Alice BevanMcGregor
wrote:
> On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said:
>>
>> Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this, let me repeat
>> my "threat". Unless more concerns are brough
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Alice Bevan–McGregor
wrote:
> On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said:
>>
>> Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this, let me repeat
>> my "threat". Unless more concerns are brought up in the next 24 hours, can
>> PEP be accepted?
On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said:
Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this, let me
repeat my "threat". Unless more concerns are brought up in the next 24
hours, can PEP be accepted? It seems a lot of people are waiting
for a decision that enables implem