On Sunday, December 11, 2011 02:55:40 AM ext Andreas Kling wrote:
Hola WebKittens!
Are there any objections to removing support for the RVCT compiler (ARM
RealView) in WebKit? As far as I know, the only user has been the Symbian
port which is no longer present on WebKit trunk.
I believe
AM
To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Removing support for the RVCT compiler
On Sunday, December 11, 2011 02:55:40 AM ext Andreas Kling wrote:
Hola WebKittens!
Are there any objections to removing support for the RVCT compiler
(ARM
RealView) in WebKit? As far as I
On 12/11/2011 05:56 AM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Eric Seidele...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm curious what the practical implications of this are? Are there
500 #ifdefs for RVCT or 5?
I think a dozen of #ifdef, plus a dozen of workarounds for compiler bugs.
I know
Hola WebKittens!
Are there any objections to removing support for the RVCT compiler (ARM
RealView) in WebKit? As far as I know, the only user has been the Symbian
port which is no longer present on WebKit trunk.
-Kling
___
webkit-dev mailing list
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Andreas Kling kl...@webkit.org wrote:
Are there any objections to removing support for the RVCT compiler (ARM
RealView) in WebKit? As far as I know, the only user has been the Symbian
port which is no longer present on WebKit trunk.
It looks like there are two
I'm curious what the practical implications of this are? Are there
500 #ifdefs for RVCT or 5?
If it doesn't have a build bot, I'm sure it is broken anyway, and can
just be removed regardless. :)
-eric
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm curious what the practical implications of this are? Are there
500 #ifdefs for RVCT or 5?
I think a dozen of #ifdef, plus a dozen of workarounds for compiler bugs.
Benjamin
___
7 matches
Mail list logo