On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Christoph P�per wrote:
>
> Simon Pieters:
> > It was pointed out to me that the start='' attribute (and the corresponding
> > DOM attribute) currently defaults to 1. This could, AFAICT, reaonably
> > trivially be changed to make it depend on the direction of the list and the
>
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, timeless wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Some list item
> > Another list item
> >
> >
> >
> > ...or:
> >
> >
> > Some list item
> > Another list item
> >
>
>
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Michael Carter wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the current Server-sent Events specification provides no
> way for a user of the event-source API to know the value of the
> lastEventId, thus making it impossible to send an ACK out-of-band. We
> have two proposals, either of which
Summary: I've made the title="" attribute on optional again.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Jens Meiert wrote:
> >
> > The point of is to expand the acronym, not to just mark up what
> > is an acryonym or abbreviation.
>
> Doesn't this claim that the general information that some text is an
> abbrevia
Make the targetOrigin argument non-optional. "*" would mean "don't care" while
anything else would specify an origin (or result in a syntax error). If this is done, it's no
longer possible to have time-of-check/time-of-use issues (in the async case) without the web
developer explicitly choos
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Aaron Leventhal wrote:
>
> So how do I know if this has been registered as a pending issue that
> will be fixed in the spec?
Any e-mail sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list that has actionable feedback
(like yours) well get a reply in due course.
If for some reason you need s
On Apr 22, 2008, at 23:35, Aaron Leventhal wrote:
So how do I know if this has been registered as a pending issue that
will be fixed in the spec?
It should show up under
http://canvex.lazyilluminati.com/misc/cgi/issues.cgi/folder/widgets-tabindex
once Hixie has filed the email.
--
Henri Siv
So how do I know if this has been registered as a pending issue that
will be fixed in the spec?
I checked with Opera and they also do tabindex="-1" makes anything
focusable.
So the spec is out of line with implementations.
- Aaron
As I mentioned in the WebKit bug report just now
(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7138):
The WhatWG spec appears to be wrong, in that it says:
A negative integer specifies that the element should be removed from the tab
order. If the element does normally take focus, it may still be f
Hi,
An incompatibility between the implementation of tabIndex between IE and
Firefox caught my attention because Webkit is now implementing tabIndex as
well. [1]
In IE, unfocusable elements with tabIndex="-1" are still not focusable. In
Firefox they are focusable. Focusable elements stay focusabl
Le 2008-04-21 à 8:19, Ian Hickson a écrit :
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Michel Fortin wrote:
Interesting. If I understand well, this CSS proposal would allow a
note
inserted in the middle of a paragraph to become a footnote. For
instance
this:
This paragraph has a footnoteThis is a footnote.
On Apr 22, 2008, at 14:18, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Elliotte Harold wrote:
2. Are control characters allowed (probably yes, based on other
parts of
the spec).
No as raw characters. Control characters that aren't in U+80-U+9F are
allowed as entities.
...
6. Are noncharacters
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Elliotte Harold wrote:
>
> In 9.1.3 we see
>
> Text must consist of valid Unicode characters other than U+. Text should
> not contain control characters other than space characters.
>
>
> Later in 9.2.3.1 we find:
>
> If the number is not a valid Unicode character (e.g.
Le 2008-04-21 à 13:20, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
Plus, who actually wants to mark up every instance of an abbreviation?
That's a ton of work for next to no reward, and apparently isn't
something
that can be automated (since there are conflicts between
abbreviations and
actual words). Mark it
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Elliotte Harold wrote:
>
> Multiple times in the draft "labelled" should be change to "labeled"
> (unless maybe this is a British spelling?) I always get this one wrong
> myself, and wouldn't have noticed if the spell checker in Thunderbird
> hadn't complained.
>
> http://di
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, �istein E. Andersen wrote:
>
> In section 5.2.2., `chickenkïwi.soup' (with diaeresis) appears twice
> (once encoded as chickenk%C3%AFwi.soup), as does `chickenkiwi.soup'
> (without diaeresis).
This apparently got fixed at some point.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, dolphinling wrote:
>
> All the links to the IETF website in the references section are broken.
> It looks like they're just missing extensions. Is this a temporary bug
> in their site, a permanent change, or has it always been that way?
I believe they've now fixed this.
--
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Aankhen wrote:
>
> > On 3/11/06, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I've reworded the paragraph like this:
> >
> > Some conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on
> > elements, attributes, methods or objects. Such requirements fall
> > int
Hi,
In the Tokenisation section, the spec states:
| Start and end tag tokens have a tag name, a self-closing flag, and a
| list of attributes, each of which has a name and a value. When a
| DOCTYPE token is created, its self-closing flag must be unset...
That should say "When a start or end ta
Nicholas Shanks:
I hope the following aids matters.
Aids? :)
Situations where expansions of abbreviations are needed:
1) People unfamiliar with the topic being discussed.
This includes adhoc abbreviations, which I frequently use in table
headers.
2) Documents that exist as b
Ian Hickson:
HTML5 had a complex mechanism for cross-references using ,
,
, and so forth. I've removed it. It really didn't add much
compared to
other than a whole lot of complexity, and there was very
little demand for it really.
It was kinda cool, though.
I've also made the title="" at
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, fantasai wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, fantasai wrote:
> >
> > > Please tell me you don't expect conformance checkers to check for
> > > potentially invalid JavaScript output...
> >
> > Obviously not, as that is mathematically impossible.
>
> Then, ple
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> It would mean that leaving the attribute out violates a conformance
> >> requirement, making the document non-conformant.
> >
> > ...the advantage of which being...?
> >
> > I don't understand the point in making this code:
> >
> >// this
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, fantasai wrote:
>
> Looking at http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-cite I
> think that adopting a clearly-styled markup convention for good examples
> and bad examples (like [1]) would be helpful. Someone carelessly
> skimming your text should not be able
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Some list item
> Another list item
>
>
>
> ...or:
>
>
> Some list item
> Another list item
>
> do you want an example showing how to use / in
> lists (like the ex
25 matches
Mail list logo
