On 6/23/13 3:37 PM, louis-rémi Babé wrote:
Hi, I've opened a bug about a ViewportObserver API that would allow
developers to receive a digest of what nodes enter or leave the viewport
(similar to MutationObserver).
The bug is on the w3's bugzilla:
Hi Xaxio
On 21 June 2013 15:59, Xaxio Brandish xaxiobrand...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve,
Please permit me to change the subject line since the topic no longer
answers the subject question?
thanks!
The next sentence in the WHATWG spec [1] states
The element can thus be used to annotate
Hi Mountie,
I think they are different experiences. we want a smooth solution.
Regards,
Charlie
2013/6/24 Mountie Lee moun...@paygate.net
for SSO,
did you tried SAML or OAuth?
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Huan Du dh20...@gmail.com wrote:
Nils,
Thanks for your feedback.
There
On Jun 17, 2013, at 17:55 , Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we need to get some browser vendors on board.
What's the process to do so?
However, I believe Firefox has been working on landing 'path' and there was a
patch for WebKit that also landed a partial path object. I'm
On Jun 24, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Jürg Lehni li...@scratchdisk.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2013, at 17:55 , Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we need to get some browser vendors on board.
What's the process to do so?
However, I believe Firefox has been working on landing 'path' and
Good morning Steve,
(had to snip the message and resend, it went over the mailing list size
limit)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.comwrote:
OK so 'typically' infers that figure is used in this way, from a recent
review of data (June 2013 data set from
2013/6/21 Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com
Any other application use cases?
Anyone?
I believe that if no unquestionable application use case can be given, then
this function should be removed from the spec.
Benoit
On 25/06/2013, at 5:56 AM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/21 Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com
Any other application use cases?
Anyone?
I believe that if no unquestionable application use case can be given, then
this function should be removed from the spec.
Well I know there will be problems: Paper.js has a Path class since 2011, and
these will clash when using the library without scoping, which is what many
people do.
I was hoping that a more specific name could be adopted before the standard is
set in stone, hence the proposal of adding 2D to
Sure, it is an implementation issue, but I think the standardization should let
it be easy. Like the tags header, footer... why we need them? right?
Regards
Charlie
在 2013-6-25,8:49,Mountie Lee moun...@paygate.net
I think it is about not for standardization issue but for implementation
10 matches
Mail list logo