On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Chia-Hung Tai wrote:
> http://chiahungtai.github.io/mediacapture-worker/
Given that removeVideoProcessor() does not take arguments, should
addVideoProcessor() not check for duplicates?
VideoProcessEventThe looks like a typo.
The events don't define constructors.
Ron Waldon writes:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 at 08:31 Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
> n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
>
>> I do not understand that use case. It reads incredibly convoluted to
>> me. The UA controls the transport anyway – it should not make any
>> practical difference to a script how t
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 at 08:31 Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
> I do not understand that use case. It reads incredibly convoluted to
> me. The UA controls the transport anyway – it should not make any
> practical difference to a script how the data is transmitted.
>
My
Ron Waldon writes:
> I posted this at http://discourse.wicg.io/ a long time ago and forgot to
> email the list about it, so here goes...
>
> ## original post
>
> There's currently no good way to determine whether or not a browser /
> environment supports GZIP-deflated content entirely from the fr
I'm incredibly excited to see this moving forward.
I posted this at http://discourse.wicg.io/ a long time ago and forgot to
email the list about it, so here goes...
## original post
There's currently no good way to determine whether or not a browser /
environment supports GZIP-deflated content entirely from the front-end.
Servers can interrogate
