On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>>
>>> What matters is the shape that is used to calculate the blur (step 1)
>>> In your example, that shape is a rectangle so j
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > >
> > > How about the strokes?
> >
> > The example in the OP didn't have them, but you'd have to include them
> > in the fill area. With the new Path objects, you'd just use
> > addPathByStrokingPath(), which would be relatively simple.
>
> Unfortunat
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Turns out it's relatively easy to do today in canvas; after you've
> > > > >
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How about the strokes?
> > >
> > > The example in the OP didn't have them, but you'd have to include them
> > > in the fill area. With the new Path objects, you'd just use
> > > addPathB
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>> What matters is the shape that is used to calculate the blur (step 1)
>> In your example, that shape is a rectangle so just the rectangle edges
>> will
>> be blurred.
>> That slight
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> What matters is the shape that is used to calculate the blur (step 1)
> In your example, that shape is a rectangle so just the rectangle edges will
> be blurred.
> That slightly blurred rectangle is then composited with the clipping region
>
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Turns out it's relatively easy to do today in canvas; after you've
> > > > drawn your shape and filled it, just add the following code:
> > >
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tyler Larson wrote:
> > > On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > > Can't you do this using clip() easily enough? Maybe I'm missing
> > > > something important her
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > >
> > > Turns out it's relatively easy to do today in canvas; after you've
> > > drawn your shape and filled it, just add the following code:
> > >
> > > c.save();
> > > c.clip();
> > > c.move
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> >
> > Turns out it's relatively easy to do today in canvas; after you've
> > drawn your shape and filled it, just add the following code:
> >
> > c.save();
> > c.clip();
> > c.moveTo(0,0);
> > c.lineTo(0,height);
> > c.lineTo(width,height);
> >
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > >
> > > It would still be quite complex to draw an inner shadow this way
> > > because the blur is calculated on the inverse of the shape. A user
> > >
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> >
> > It would still be quite complex to draw an inner shadow this way because
> > the blur is calculated on the inverse of the shape.
> > A user will need to draw to another canvas and then 'clear' i
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
> It would still be quite complex to draw an inner shadow this way because
> the blur is calculated on the inverse of the shape.
> A user will need to draw to another canvas and then 'clear' it to get the
> inverse.
Turns out it's much easier than that;
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>> With both types of shadow, you take the shape of the element and calculate
>> the blur image.
>>
>> With an outer shadow, you take the result of the blur and composite it.
>> After t
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> With both types of shadow, you take the shape of the element and calculate
> the blur image.
>
> With an outer shadow, you take the result of the blur and composite it.
> After this, you composite the original shape.
> With an inner shadow, y
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tyler Larson wrote:
> > On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > Can't you do this using clip() easily enough? Maybe I'm missing
> > > something important here. Can you elaborate?
> >
> > Here is an example of what I am
On Nov 23, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tyler Larson wrote:
>> On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> Can't you do this using clip() easily enough? Maybe I'm missing
>>> something important here. Can you elaborate?
>>
>> Here is an example of what I
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tyler Larson wrote:
> > On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > Can't you do this using clip() easily enough? Maybe I'm missing
> > > something important here. Can you elaborate?
> >
> > Here is an example o
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tyler Larson wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > Can't you do this using clip() easily enough? Maybe I'm missing
> > something important here. Can you elaborate?
>
> Here is an example of what I am talking about.
> http://i.imgur.com/Sy4xM.png
> Cli
With both types of shadow, you take the shape of the element and calculate
the blur image.
With an outer shadow, you take the result of the blur and composite it.
After this, you composite the original shape.
With an inner shadow, you draw the shape first followed by the blur image.
Importantly, t
On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Can't you do this using clip() easily enough? Maybe I'm missing something
> important here. Can you elaborate?
Here is an example of what I am talking about.
http://i.imgur.com/Sy4xM.png
Clip would mask something but adding an inner shadow is
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Tyler Larson wrote:
>
> Shadows can be applied to the outside of anything. This is a great
> feature that is otherwise rather difficult to recreate but why not
> enable users to be able to have inner shadows? Things like beveling,
> embossing and many other stylistic things
You can specify negative shadow offsets for shadows inside a shape. Is that
not good enough?
david
On Thursday, April 26, 2012, Tyler Larson wrote:
> Shadows can be applied to the outside of anything. This is a great feature
> that is otherwise rather difficult to recreate but why not enable us
Shadows can be applied to the outside of anything. This is a great feature that
is otherwise rather difficult to recreate but why not enable users to be able
to have inner shadows? Things like beveling, embossing and many other stylistic
things that are used in today designs rely on inner shadow
24 matches
Mail list logo
