On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Oli Studholme wrote:
>
> Over at http://html5doctor.com we�ve been using this pattern when
> quoting e.g. from the HTML5 spec:
>
>
> [block quote]
> � [title of work]
>
>
> I wrote about our use of blockquote and footer in
> http://html5doctor.com/blockquote-q-cite/ re
2011-07-01 11:26, Simon Pieters wrote:
Simon felt that “Content inside a blockquote must be quoted from
another source” excludes footer.
s/footer/attribution/
Indeed since it's a conformance requirement, in valid documents the
content inside blockquote is quoted from another source. If the sp
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> is sectioning root.
Oops. I stand corrected, never mind me.
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:56:11 +0200, Aryeh Gregor
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Oli Studholme
wrote:
[block quote]
— [title of work]
This is incorrect according to the current definition of .
Footer definition:
“The footer element represents a footer for its nearest ance
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Oli Studholme wrote:
>
> [block quote]
> — [title of work]
>
This is incorrect according to the current definition of .
> Footer definition:
> “The footer element represents a footer for its nearest ancestor
> sectioning content or sectioning root element.
Hi All,
Over at http://html5doctor.com we’ve been using this pattern when
quoting e.g. from the HTML5 spec:
[block quote]
— [title of work]
I wrote about our use of blockquote and footer in
http://html5doctor.com/blockquote-q-cite/ recently, which lead to
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show
