On Tue, 3 May 2011, Roger Hågensen wrote:
>
> Is there a need for say a ? (short for paragraph break) default
> behavior being the same as two .
Isn't that just two paragraphs separate from each other?
... ...
> Then again getting folks to change would be hard, so maybe a and
> wou
Kornel Lesiński wrote:
>
> Parsing of non-HTML elements is not interoperable between IE and non-IE
> browsers. IE already supports self-closing syntax on prefixed elements,
> but other browsers don't:
>
> http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C!DOCTYPE%20html%3E%3Cbody%3
On 2011-05-03 00:47, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Kornel Lesi�~Dski wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:18:52 -, Ian Hickson wrote:
For example, markup such as the following is sadly common:
Hello world!
I have therefore not changed the spec in response to this request.
On Fri
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Kornel Lesi�~Dski wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:18:52 -, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > For example, markup such as the following is sadly common:
> >
> > Hello world!
> >
> > I have therefore not changed the spec in response to this request.
>
> I've checked www.dotne
Ian Hickson writes:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, William F Hammond wrote:
>>
>> In the spec at 8.1.2.1 (6) (for the text/html serialization):
The section number refers to the W3C version at
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/
>>Then, if the element is one of the void elements, or if the
>>element is
2010/12/31 Kornel Lesiński :
> I think HTML5 can specify that a fixed set of old HTML elements has to be
> closed according to HTML rules, but all other elements support self-closing
> syntax like XML.
That just makes the HTML syntax even more complicated and confusing.
At least at present it's co
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:18:52 -, Ian Hickson wrote:
For example, markup such as the following is sadly common:
Hello world!
I have therefore not changed the spec in response to this request.
I've checked www.dotnetdotcom.org dataset looking for …,
excluding
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, William F Hammond wrote:
>
> In the spec at 8.1.2.1 (6) (for the text/html serialization):
>
>Then, if the element is one of the void elements, or if the
>element is a foreign element, then there may be a single U+002F
>SOLIDUS character (/). This character has n
Bjoern Hoehrmann writes:
> * William F Hammond wrote:
>>Does anyone seriously think that "" is an ordinary open tag?
>
> They do if it's like in `http://example.org/>`.
Well, the spec (w3 version) has detailed parsing rules for text/html
in section 8.2. I _think_ those rules would understand th
* William F Hammond wrote:
>Does anyone seriously think that "" is an ordinary open tag?
They do if it's like in `http://example.org/>`.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dageb
>> For example, while it is true that major browsers seem to treat ""
>> as an open tag, the relevant question for backward comptatibility is
>> whether anyone has been relying on the idea that "" can be used to
>> begin a non-empty paragraph.
>
> Sites unfortunately do things like that so we cann
On 9/26/10 4:12 PM, William F Hammond wrote:
For example, while it is true that major browsers seem to treat ""
as an open tag, the relevant question for backward comptatibility is
whether anyone has been relying on the idea that "" can be used to
begin a non-empty paragraph.
Sites rely on that
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:12:16 +0200, William F Hammond
wrote:
[Originally mailed to whatwg on Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:24:49 -0400,
but blocked from the list due to subscription troubles]
Glad it worked out now!
[...]
For example, while it is true that major browsers seem to treat ""
as an ope
[Originally mailed to whatwg on Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:24:49 -0400,
but blocked from the list due to subscription troubles]
In the spec at 8.1.2.1 (6) (for the text/html serialization):
Then, if the element is one of the void elements, or if the
element is a foreign element, then there may b
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:24:49 +0200, William F Hammond
wrote:
For example, while it is true that major browsers seem to treat ""
as an open tag, the relevant question for backward comptatibility is
whether anyone has been relying on the idea that "" can be used to
begin a non-empty paragraph.
15 matches
Mail list logo