> I'll be checking in an URIRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy in the
> next days that basically takes the remaining URL fragment and
> gives it to the user as getURI(). To follow your advice,
> I will also add an example of how to combine this with a
> ResourceStreamRequest
* Jonathan Locke:
> Someone should really make an example or even a reusable class
> like that. What you're suggesting is very non-obvious to a
> newbie.
I'll be checking in an URIRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy in the
next days that basically takes the remaining URL fragment and
Someone should really make an example or even a reusable class
like that. What you're suggesting is very non-obvious to a newbie.
Jean-Baptiste Quenot-3 wrote:
>
> * ZedroS Schwart:
>
>> Regarding static content, is it such a big issue to have some
>> wicket html pages with empty classes
* ZedroS Schwart:
> Regarding static content, is it such a big issue to have some
> wicket html pages with empty classes behind ?
You don't even need empty classes to serve static content with
Wicket, just use a custom IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy together
with a ResourceStreamRequestT
Regarding static content, is it such a big issue to have some wicket
html pages with empty classes behind ?
Thanks in advance
ZedroS
On 3/15/07, Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is definitely possible. First make sure you are running 1.2.5 or
> better (this will fix a bug where posts did not
It is definitely possible. First make sure you are running 1.2.5 or
better (this will fix a bug where posts did not have a '/' after the
context name if you choose to deploy the application with a non root
context). Map your servlet to '/*' ... Next, deploy. =)
The only other issue to worry about
On 3/12/07, Brian Topping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
Yes, with Ivy. Maybe not "cool", but works very well :-)
- Xavier
:b
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
>
> Thought y'all might be interested:
>
> http://opensource.joost.com
Danke schön Rüdiger !
I understand better now.
Have a good day
++
ZedroS
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & bus
Hello,
the Filter is not in Wicket 1.2.x, only 1.3 and 2.0.
ZedroS Schwart schrieb:
> Hi all
>
> On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
>> WicketServlet
>
> I'm sorry but I didn't a WicketFilter class in th
Hi all
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
> WicketServlet
I'm sorry but I didn't a WicketFilter class in the API nor in the
wicket examples. And the web.xml file from wicket examples seems
rather normal to
I thought everybody knew this, Jonathan I guess once mentioned it on his
weblog. And there's also another big one here
http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2007/03/10/myspace-going-wicket/
On 3/13/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i was being sarcastic :)
-igor
On 3/12/07, Jonathan Lock
i was being sarcastic :)
-igor
On 3/12/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think that's correct. but i also heard that it will be publicly visible
later.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 3/12/07, co
i think that's correct. but i also heard that it will be publicly visible
later.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If they use Wicket why doesn't it sho
look how wicket-examples are setup
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's news to me :) Thanks!
I tried reading more about it on the Wiki but I couldn't find an
example that maps the root. The example in
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html maps
That's news to me :) Thanks!
I tried reading more about it on the Wiki but I couldn't find an
example that maps the root. The example in
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html maps the application to
"/app". Do you have another example or documentation somewhere?
Gili
Ig
it is ok to do that (use /* mapping) if you use WicketFilter instead of
WicketServlet
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Brian,
Yes you can probably do that for a Wicket site with no external
references (i.e. static files hosted outside the scope of the servlet
su
Hi Brian,
Yes you can probably do that for a Wicket site with no external
references (i.e. static files hosted outside the scope of the servlet
such as images) but last time I checked the Wicket developers were
recommending against such a configuration.
Gili
Brian Topping wrote:
> Gili,
Gili,
I think I did this on http://www.autoscraper.com...
Brian
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:30 PM, cowwoc wrote:
>
> My point is that you can't do that with Wicket, unless you know
> something I don't...?
>
> Gili
>
> Ryan wrote:
>> In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet contex
My point is that you can't do that with Wicket, unless you know
something I don't...?
Gili
Ryan wrote:
> In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet context path
> (wicket or no wicket).
>
> Ryan
>
> On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If they use Wicke
In any public application I deploy I remove the servlet context path
(wicket or no wicket).
Ryan
On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
> joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
> con
is it at all feasible that it is being used for an internal system?
-igor
On 3/12/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
context path...
Gili
Brian
If they use Wicket why doesn't it show at all on their website at
joost.com? I am expecting to at least see some evidence of a servlet
context path...
Gili
Brian Topping wrote:
> Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
>
> :b
>
> On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
Here I thought they were cool, then they use Ant?!?
:b
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:45 AM, mraible wrote:
>
> Thought y'all might be interested:
>
> http://opensource.joost.com/
>
> Joost is a new company started by the founders of Skype:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joost
>
> Matt
> --
> View th
Thought y'all might be interested:
http://opensource.joost.com/
Joost is a new company started by the founders of Skype:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joost
Matt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Joost-uses-Wicket-tf3390296.html#a9437082
Sent from the Wicket - User mailin
24 matches
Mail list logo
