https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45640
--- Comment #7 from Brion Vibber ---
Workaround:
* open SVG file in browser
* print to PDF
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45640
Tuxyso changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tux...@gmx.de
--- Comment #6 from Tuxyso ---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45640
--- Comment #5 from Andre Klapper ---
Saying "PNG fits all" wasn't my intention (sorry if it came across like that).
I was rather after finding a good argument for PDF/PS, and am wondering if PDF
import is that much better than SVG import in m
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45640
--- Comment #4 from Eduard Braun ---
You can't argue that we didn't need PDF or PS export because we already had PNG
export. PDF/PS is vector based, PNG is rasterized.
Sure, all these things *work* with PNG, but do you *want* to do them with P
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45640
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Lowest
Version|unspecified
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45640
--- Comment #2 from Eduard Braun ---
There is currently a request on German Wikipedia for such a feature, that's how
I got to the idea
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Diskussion:WikiProjekt_SVG#PDF-Exportm.C3.B6glichkeit_f.C3.BCr_SVG-Da
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45640
--- Comment #1 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) ---
Beyond being kind of cool, what is the usecase for this? (Or more to the point
is this something that would be widely useful?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
