https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
Sumana Harihareswara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|need-review |reviewed
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
Ashar Voultoiz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||has...@free.fr
Summary|Fea
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #6 from Gurch 2010-11-12 16:11:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > More privacy invasion, lovely. Did you ever consider actually mentioning in
> > the
> > Foundation privacy policy that you track eve
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #7 from Jyothis Edathoot 2010-11-12 17:14:48
UTC ---
Please read the checkuser extn documentation in mediawiki. I am not sure why
you sound surprised with this. All checkusers should be using the tool per
checkuser policy. if you h
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #8 from Huji 2010-11-12 21:02:44 UTC ---
Aaron,
I will open a new bug for the HTML stuff and fix it, then I'll create a new
patch against the new revision, which only deals with the current bug
specifically.
Thanks for the advice,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #9 from Gurch 2010-11-12 21:08:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Please read the checkuser extn documentation in mediawiki. I am not sure why
> you sound surprised with this. All checkusers should be using the tool per
> checku
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #10 from Aaron Schulz 2010-11-12 21:39:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Aaron,
>
> I will open a new bug for the HTML stuff and fix it, then I'll create a new
> patch against the new revision, which only deals with the curren
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #11 from Ashar Voultoiz 2010-11-12 23:02:34 UTC ---
Gurch > please discuss the policy issue on meta or on wikimedia-l . This bug
report is just about implementing the feature in the MediaWiki software.
Aaron > once reviewed, can yo
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #12 from Huji 2010-11-18 17:49:00 UTC ---
r76949 uses XML instead of hard-coded HTML in the user interface.
I will send a separate patch as soon as I can, which adds the UA feature.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedi
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
Huji changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7813|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #14 from Aaron Schulz 2010-11-18 19:27:22
UTC ---
Why do we need user-agents for an IP or IP range? "get users" already does that
to an extent (and grouped by user).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #15 from Huji 2010-11-18 23:18:38 UTC ---
The whole point of adding this feature is to facilitate finding a UA without
having to go through a long list of possibly duplicated UAs. Assume an IP range
includes a very large number of u
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #16 from Aaron Schulz 2010-11-18 23:19:55
UTC ---
Yes, but why are they looking at all agents for an IP range?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #17 from Huji 2010-11-19 05:24:35 UTC ---
To "rule out" someone with their user-agent of interest is actually editing
from that range.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #18 from Gurch 2010-11-20 21:11:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Yes, but why are they looking at all agents for an IP range?
because privacy invasion is fun!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #19 from Huji 2010-11-21 20:34:41 UTC ---
Dear Gurch,
You really need to find a better place to express your thoughts. Right here, we
are only talking about the technical aspects of a software extension. How this
extension is used
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #20 from Huji 2010-11-25 22:01:22 UTC ---
Aaron,
Any comments? I'd rather be finished with one bug before proceeding to another
one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rec
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #21 from Aaron Schulz 2010-11-25 23:01:20
UTC ---
I have limited time to look at this. But, for a patch:
(i) All agent results should deal with duplicate agent strings and the time
bounds for each (of the 5000 checked).
(ii) I woul
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
MZMcBride changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@mzmcbride.com
--- Comment #22 from MZ
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #23 from Huji 2010-11-26 06:16:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> I have limited time to look at this. But, for a patch:
> (i) All agent results should deal with duplicate agent strings and the time
> bounds for each (of the 500
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #24 from Huji 2011-01-26 21:27:16 UTC ---
Any progress here? Has anybody had the time to check the patch?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24411
--- Comment #25 from Aaron Schulz 2011-01-27 00:27:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > I have limited time to look at this. But, for a patch:
> > (i) All agent results should deal with duplicate agent strings a
22 matches
Mail list logo
