Hi everybody,
while I understand that there are cases, where it is not the best idea, at
least at the data entry point, to decide if something is a class or an
individual, like in the case of car brands, models, etc. I don't understand why
the obvious individuals, such as (instances) of
Hi, both instance and subclass is possible, see
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Item_classification
This has been a subject of dispute though, but this is a powerful tool,
allowed by standards like OWL2 through punning
2014-12-30 22:35 GMT+01:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com:
Automobile (Q1420) had the claims [1]:
*subclass of* motor road vehicle
*instance of* motor road vehicle
That was incorrect. An instance of motor road vehicle is something like
the Peekskill Meteorite Car (Q7756463) [2].
It is generally incorrect when an item has *instance of* and
Not sure either it's writeable as punning imply to treat the
class/individual as different things ...
tried to dig if it is possible in SWRL (see
http://dior.ics.muni.cz/~makub/owl/ for example), seems not so easy either,
found this topic on semanticweb.com (google cache
Having followed Freebase and the announcement about migrating to
Wikidata, I'm trying to get up to speed on the structure of Wikidata. I
read on the site that relationships such as subclass-of and instance-of
are managed by everyone. Looking at automobile (Q1420) I see that it is
both
