moved, and it's highly unlikely, in this time
> >>> of my life, that I'll change the way I patrol.
> >>>
> >>> Emily
> >>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Carcharoth wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Oops! That's right, I
t;>> Emily
>>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Carcharoth wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oops! That's right, I completely forgot that! :-/
>>>>
>>>> Carcharoth
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Andrew
>>&g
rote:
> >>> Non-logged in people cant create new articles.
> >>>
> >>> - "Carcharoth" wrote:
> >>>> From: "Carcharoth"
> >>>> To: "English Wikipedia"
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, 13 Augu
wrote:
>>> Non-logged in people cant create new articles.
>>>
>>> - "Carcharoth" wrote:
>>>> From: "Carcharoth"
>>>> To: "English Wikipedia"
>>>> Sent: Thursday, 13 August, 2009 17:10:41 GMT +00:00 G
>>
>> - "Carcharoth" wrote:
>>> From: "Carcharoth"
>>> To: "English Wikipedia"
>>> Sent: Thursday, 13 August, 2009 17:10:41 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain,
>>> Ireland, Portugal
>>> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Dr
a"
>> Sent: Thursday, 13 August, 2009 17:10:41 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
>> Portugal
>> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Drafting - was Re: Civility poll results
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Charles
>> Matthews wrote:
>> > Carcharoth wrote:
&
Non-logged in people cant create new articles.
- "Carcharoth" wrote:
> From: "Carcharoth"
> To: "English Wikipedia"
> Sent: Thursday, 13 August, 2009 17:10:41 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
> Portugal
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Drafting
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Charles
Matthews wrote:
> Carcharoth wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM, FT2 wrote:
>>
>>> I'd be in favor of a "Draft:" namespace, which users could use for drafting
>>> articles. Content to be non-spidered. That way we can tell a user to see if
>>> some oth
Carcharoth wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM, FT2 wrote:
>
>> I'd be in favor of a "Draft:" namespace, which users could use for drafting
>> articles. Content to be non-spidered. That way we can tell a user to see if
>> some other user has started work on a draft already.
>>
>> This would