On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Steven Walling
wrote:
> Following up on this...
>
> The Editor Engagement Experiments team had the first one of these with Erik
> and Sue last Tuesday (the 15th). Tilman was there to take notes, and I
> published our slide deck, so there is a transcript and PDF to
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:51 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Keegan Peterzell wrote:
>>1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS/Reports/2012
>>2. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS
>
> Nice. Thanks for putting this together. :-)
>
> MZMcBride
>
+1, thanks, this is a great report! It's very cool to see th
Hi,
great question, Richard! Seconding Matthew's comment on WMF blog policy: At
Wikimedia Deutschland we adopted the bottom notes for posts with multiple
images[1]. As a general rule, we include attribution in the bylines[2].
Adding yet another aspect to sufficient CC licensing, let's not forget
2013/1/22 ??? :
> On 22/01/2013 18:28, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>
>> On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable
>>> as
>>> attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
>>>
>>> - Does anyone have any input o
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Richard Symonds
wrote:
>
> The CC family of licences [...] however, say that
> you need to have attribution using a byline next to the image, in the
> fashion 'Horation Nelson/CC-BY-SA'.
Err, where?
Looking at the text of the CC-BY-SA-3.0, it looks to me like it
On 22/01/2013 18:28, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
wrote:
It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable as
attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
- Does anyone have any input on this?
- Has this discussion been had befo
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
wrote:
> It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable as
> attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
>
>- Does anyone have any input on this?
>- Has this discussion been had before, if so, where?
>- Should Wikipe
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Richard Symonds <
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a question for you which I am sure you will enjoy discussing. It's
> about licencing.
>
> Wikimedia sites do not use a 'byline' on their images - for example,
> http://commons.wikimedia.or
I've always considered this poor policy on the part of Wikipedia; a sort of
intellectual "grab" that we do so well :(
I've uploaded images before by great photographers, after working to obtain
their permission, and make a point of crediting them when inserting the
image into the article - partly
And I'm also unsure all the upload wizards have the same text?
2013/1/22 David Gerard
> On 22 January 2013 17:41, Philippe Beaudette
> wrote:
>
> > FYI, each and every edit on Commons has this text above the edit box:
> > "...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the
On 22 January 2013 17:41, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
> FYI, each and every edit on Commons has this text above the edit box:
> "...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the
> Creative Commons license."
Yeah, but Commons pulls in stuff from other CC-licenced places, so
FYI, each and every edit on Commons has this text above the edit box:
"...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the
Creative Commons license."
pb
___
Philippe Beaudette
Director, Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
415-839-6885, x 6643
phili
Reminder that this happens in about 25 minutes...
A note from the legal and community advocacy team:
__
*Hi everyone,
We are happy to spend the next hour talking about issues facing the Legal
and Community Advocacy Department.
People are free to raise any topics, but some r
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
wrote:
> The CC family of licences, and Commons re-use guidelines, however, say that
> you need to have attribution using a byline next to the image, in the
> fashion 'Horation Nelson/CC-BY-SA'.
>
> It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlin
All,
I have a question for you which I am sure you will enjoy discussing. It's
about licencing.
Wikimedia sites do not use a 'byline' on their images - for example,
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page requires an image to be clicked
on before you can view the licence and the author inform
Glad to see the process is coming along :-)
Could you please clarify the purpose of one of the mandatory questions in
the form:
" Hong Kong is an international gourmet paradise. Please use less than 200
words to describe your favourite dish of food."
Is this an English-language test? Or, is this
Keegan Peterzell wrote:
>1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS/Reports/2012
>2. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS
Nice. Thanks for putting this together. :-)
MZMcBride
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: htt
Hi Everyone,
2013 is an election year for the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia
Foundation.
As you may recall the board has three directly elected representatives
on it which serve for two years. Currently those are Mindspillage, SJ
and Wing. As in the past years we rely on an effective ele
18 matches
Mail list logo
