Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-16 Thread Jamie Morken
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:34:41 -0800 From: Brion Vibber Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer? To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 2/16/10 7:03 AM, Jamie Morken wrote: > Ok, the simple question: how m

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-16 Thread Brion Vibber
On 2/11/10 7:41 AM, emman...@engelhart.org wrote: > Almost one month ago I have reported a bug in mwdumper which seems to me to > be critical. > I simply can't user mwdumper with the itwiki XML dumps: > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22137 > > I have extract the problematic part of

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-16 Thread Brion Vibber
On 2/16/10 7:03 AM, Jamie Morken wrote: > Ok, the simple question: how many people prefer XML or sql dumps? I think we have a FAQ on this... http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Download#What_happened_to_the_SQL_dumps.3F You *do* realize that such "SQL dumps" would have to be invented from whole clo

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-16 Thread Dmitriy Sintsov
* Jamie Morken [Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:03:18 -0800]: > Ok, the simple question: how many people prefer XML or sql dumps? > I use XML dumps at my own much smaller wikis all the time. The advantages are already described by emman...@engelhart.org I never tried to load huge wp-en dumps, though. I've he

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-16 Thread Jamie Morken
> * Your are DB neutral, so you do not need to have a version for > mysql, for postgres... The mysql can be converted to postgres and vice versa directly, so the xml isn't necessary for this, see: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:PostgreSQL > * You may apply filter easily > * The XML is

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-16 Thread Domas Mituzas
Hi! > Converting the xml to sql takes a long time for big wiki's and people seem to > have problems with this step, so why isn't the sql format available for > download instead of the xml format? Our dumps are not 'sql dumps'. We assemble them from all the different parts (memcached, multiple

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-16 Thread emmanuel
Le mar 16/02/10 14:13, "Jamie Morken" jmor...@shaw.ca a écrit: > What is the benefit of the database dumps being archived/distributed in xml > format instead of sql format?  Converting the xml to sql takes a long time > for big wiki's and people seem to have problems with this step, so why > isn't

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-16 Thread Jamie Morken
Hi, What is the benefit of the database dumps being archived/distributed in xml format instead of sql format?  Converting the xml to sql takes a long time for big wiki's and people seem to have problems with this step, so why isn't the sql format available for download instead of the xml forma

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-12 Thread Bilal Abdul Kader
mwDumper is essential also for anyone wiling to replicate a wiki locally for any purpose. There are alternatives such as xml2SQL or importDump.php but mwDumper is the most efficient in terms of correctness and completeness or speed sometimes. bilal == Verily, with hardship comes ease. On Fri, Fe

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-12 Thread emmanuel
Le ven 12/02/10 14:24, "Christensen, Courtney" christens...@battelle.org a écrit: > We use the DumpHTML extension > (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:DumpHTML) to > make static copies of our wikis. It used to be a maintenance script. > Maybe that would work for you? The DumpHTML extensi

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-12 Thread Christensen, Courtney
emman...@engelhart.org said: > Le ven 12/02/10 01:52, "Tim Starling" tstarl...@wikimedia.org a écrit: >>> emman...@engelhart.org wrote: >>> mwdumper is an almost mandatory tool to spread our >>> content and for this reason i wanted to >>> speak about that on the ML. >> >> You might have to be mo

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-12 Thread emmanuel
Le ven 12/02/10 01:52, "Tim Starling" tstarl...@wikimedia.org a écrit: > emmanu > e...@engelhart.org wrote: > mwdumper is an almost mandatory tool to spread our > content and for this reason i wanted to > speak about that on the ML. > > You might have to be more specific than that. It doesn't se

Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-11 Thread Tim Starling
emman...@engelhart.org wrote: > mwdumper is an almost mandatory tool to spread our content and for this > reason i wanted to > speak about that on the ML. You might have to be more specific than that. It doesn't seem like a mandatory tool to me. -- Tim Starling _

[Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?

2010-02-11 Thread emmanuel
Hi Almost one month ago I have reported a bug in mwdumper which seems to me to be critical. I simply can't user mwdumper with the itwiki XML dumps: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22137 I have extract the problematic part of the XML but until now I do not have had any remark abo