On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:23, Tei wrote:
> On 13 August 2010 10:27, Lars Aronsson wrote:
> ...
> > If we applied this web 2.0 principle to Wikibooks and Wikisource,
> > we wouldn't need to have pages with previous/next links. We could
> > just have smooth, continuous scrolling in one long seque
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Lars Aronsson wrote:
> Wikipedia, Wikibooks and Wikisource mostly use web 1.0 technology.
> A very different approach to web browsing was taken when Google
> Maps was launched in 2005, the poster project for the "web 2.0".
> You arrive at the map site with a coordi
On 13 August 2010 12:23, Tei wrote:
> On 13 August 2010 10:27, Lars Aronsson wrote:
> ...
>> If we applied this web 2.0 principle to Wikibooks and Wikisource,
>> we wouldn't need to have pages with previous/next links. We could
>> just have smooth, continuous scrolling in one long sequence. Reade
On 13 August 2010 10:27, Lars Aronsson wrote:
...
> If we applied this web 2.0 principle to Wikibooks and Wikisource,
> we wouldn't need to have pages with previous/next links. We could
> just have smooth, continuous scrolling in one long sequence. Readers
> could still arrive at a given coordinat
On 08/11/2010 09:46 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> This seems like a very weird way to do things. Why is the book being
> split up by page to begin with? For optimal reading, you should put a
> lot more than one book-page's worth of content on each web page.
ThomasV will give the introduction to Proo
