[Wikitech-l] Caching Discussion: Dealing with old (deleted) wmf branches

2013-02-22 Thread Greg Grossmeier
Hello all, Background and longer/more detailed discussion on this issue is in bug 44570: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44570 Summary: As we delete old -wmfX branches there appears to be cached pages that reference old branch URLs, eg: https://bits.wikimedia.org/static-1.21wmf1/sk

Re: [Wikitech-l] Caching Discussion: Dealing with old (deleted) wmf branches

2013-02-22 Thread Krinkle
On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Greg Grossmeier wrote: > Hello all, > > Background and longer/more detailed discussion on this issue is in bug > 44570: > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44570 > > Summary: > As w > e delete old -wmfX branches there appears to be cached pages that >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Caching Discussion: Dealing with old (deleted) wmf branches

2013-02-22 Thread Greg Grossmeier
> Well, the obvious thing to do and imho what we should do, like, *right now* > is extend the lifetime of the old branch to the timeout of the cache. > > Simply not deleting a directory is very, very easy. That is definitely a good stop-gap solution until we figure out a fix to the underlying is

Re: [Wikitech-l] Caching Discussion: Dealing with old (deleted) wmf branches

2013-02-23 Thread Rob Lanphier
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Krinkle wrote: > Well, the obvious thing to do and imho what we should do, like, *right now* > is extend the lifetime of the old branch to the timeout of the cache. > > Simply not deleting a directory is very, very easy. > > As far as I'm concerned we can agree rig

Re: [Wikitech-l] Caching Discussion: Dealing with old (deleted) wmf branches

2013-02-23 Thread Platonides
Another option is just to only keep old versions of skins folder (1.4M) Given that CSS and JS go through the RL, the few images we use and link from the html could probably be squeezed in a single static path, though. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikit