As part of the Wine 1.0 effort, we've been working on improving the
Wine documentation.
We have a proposal for a way to overhaul the documentation system,
and we'd like some feedback.
We start with the following goals:
1. Documentation should be easy to find
2. Documentation should be
Jeremy White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. If it's a separate tree, multiple developers be given commit
access to the new tree. I think commit access would be
basically granted to any developer who requests
it, so long as they have some standing in the
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Jeremy White wrote:
2. Documentation should be clear (the user should quickly see
the thing that he or she wants, and there should be no confusion
as to which document is 'right')
Sounds good!
4. Switch the FAQ to use a FAQ-O-MATIC, to
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Jeremy White wrote:
2. Documentation should be clear (the user should quickly see
the thing that he or she wants, and there should be no confusion
as to which document is 'right')
Sounds good!
4. Switch the FAQ
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 08:41:37PM -0400, Douglas J. Hunley wrote:
James Juran wrote:
But a manually edited FAQ requires rather constant (or at least
consistent) attention, which it is not receiving now. Unless someone is
willing to be a more regular FAQ editor than the current WineHQ
