--- Paul Vriens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Fix a warning and remove the now not needed cast.
Changelog
Cast-qual warning fix
Cheers,
Paul.
diff --git a/dlls/urlmon/umon.c
b/dlls/urlmon/umon.c
index 49260ab..d593c81 100644
--- a/dlls/urlmon/umon.c
+++
Hi, just wanted to double-check with msi ppl and other wine developers
if it's okay to add my conformance test to the test_MsiInstallProduct
function. My reasons for doing this versus a completely separate test
function are as follows:
1. The test is already testing a full product install
I believe this one causes problems -- please do not commit yet
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail QA for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.From
8686a200bd1f1cbd934d761013c487a9ddc195c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe this one causes problems --
please do not commit yet
Sorry for the spamming - the patch should be alright
-
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-static const MINIDUMP_DIRECTORY* get_mdmp_dir(const MINIDUMP_HEADER* hdr, int
str_idx)
+static const MINIDUMP_DIRECTORY* get_mdmp_dir(const MINIDUMP_HEADER*
hdr,unsigned long int str_idx)
Please keep white space unchanged.
-while (ptr - (const
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 08:33 -0600, Misha Koshelev wrote:
Hi, just wanted to double-check with msi ppl and other wine developers
if it's okay to add my conformance test to the test_MsiInstallProduct
function. My reasons for doing this versus a completely separate test
function are as follows:
Joris Huizer wrote:
- int len = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, lpNameW, -1, lpName,
+ unsigned int len = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, lpNameW, -1, lpName,
This isn't right. WideCharToMultiByte returns INT, which is signed.
@@ -1995,11 +1995,11 @@ LookupAccountSidW(
if (dm) {
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, here is my proposed patch to the current msi MsiInstallProduct
consistency test that will make it's success depend on proper process of
UI flags (as well as everything else it depends on to make a successful
install). It seems to me like
Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joris Huizer wrote:
- int len = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, lpNameW, -1, lpName,
+ unsigned int len = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, lpNameW, -1, lpName,
This isn't right. WideCharToMultiByte returns INT, which is signed.
@@ -1995,11 +1995,11 @@
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:30 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, here is my proposed patch to the current msi MsiInstallProduct
consistency test that will make it's success depend on proper process of
UI flags (as well as everything else it
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:30 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, here is my proposed patch to the current msi MsiInstallProduct
consistency test that will make it's success depend on proper
Mike McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ITypeLib *get_msi_typelib( LPWSTR *path )
+{
+static CRITICAL_SECTION cs = { NULL, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
Please use the standard pattern for static critical sections. Setting
the debug info to NULL is reserved for global sections.
--
Alexandre
Robert Shearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This fixes a bunch of tmarshal tests.
It doesn't seem to make any difference for me:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M oleaut32.dll -T ../../.. -p
oleaut32_test.exe.so tmarshal.c touch tmarshal.ok
tmarshal.c:139: Test failed: CoMarshalInterface
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Robert Shearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This fixes a bunch of tmarshal tests.
It doesn't seem to make any difference for me:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M oleaut32.dll -T ../../.. -p oleaut32_test.exe.so
tmarshal.c touch tmarshal.ok
Robert Shearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you remove ~/.wine? It only registers the typelib if the typelib
hasn't already been registered (perhaps this should be changed.)
Ah sorry, I missed that part. Yes, I think that needs to be changed,
we can't ask people to rm -rf their .wine dir all
Felix Nawothnig wrote:
Hi. comctl32 exports (undocumented) Alloc() and friends which call
LocalAlloc = GlobalAlloc = HeapAlloc since it's doesn't use any
fancy LMEM / GMEM flags... so shouldn't Alloc() call HeapAlloc()
directly?
If Global/Local* behave different than Heap* on Windows -
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:23 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:30 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, here is my
Can somebody help this (german-speaking) fellow:
http://www.unixboard.de/vb3/showthread.php?t=26943
He says his company's internal application requires
you to input a DSN when installing it, and he doesn't
know how to come up with a DSN under Wine.
Presumably he doesn't want to mess with
On 2/7/07, Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this one causes problems -- please do not commit yet
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail QA for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.From
On 2/7/07, Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-static const MINIDUMP_DIRECTORY* get_mdmp_dir(const MINIDUMP_HEADER* hdr,
int str_idx)
+static const MINIDUMP_DIRECTORY* get_mdmp_dir(const MINIDUMP_HEADER*
hdr,unsigned long int str_idx)
Please
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 16:46 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:23 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:30 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07,
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 16:46 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:23 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at
Well, by definition, that's not really a conformance test because it
doesn't conform to windows. Did you make the property public and add
the property to the Property table?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa370912.aspx
First of all, I added the Property to the Property table,
Well, by definition, that's not really a conformance test because it
doesn't conform to windows. Did you make the property public and add
the property to the Property table?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa370912.aspx
Aha, google search figured it out:
* Property name ALL
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 23:46 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/7/07, Misha Koshelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, by definition, that's not really a conformance test because it
doesn't conform to windows. Did you make the property public and add
the property to the Property table?
On Thursday 08 February 2007 01:42, Dan Kegel wrote:
Can somebody help this (german-speaking) fellow:
http://www.unixboard.de/vb3/showthread.php?t=26943
He says his company's internal application requires
you to input a DSN when installing it, and he doesn't
know how to come up with a DSN
Mike McCormack wrote:
---
This is the way ref counting is done everywhere else in Wine.
Ref counts can be assumed to be between 0 and MAXLONG, so the fact
that LONG is signed isn't important.
NO. The DCOM spec says that STDOBJREF::cPublicRefs is unsigned,
therefore the ref counts can be
27 matches
Mail list logo
