On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:09:37AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which program do I have to use to get connected in the #winehq
> channel?
>
> I have truly been out of chatting for a long time.
http://www.winehq.org/site/irc
--
cu
pgpXKn8BUAWak.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dear all,
Which program do I have to use to get connected in the #winehq channel?
I have truly been out of chatting for a long time.
On 10/7/07, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> King InuYasha wrote:
> > I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
> > a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
> > which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio nat
On 10/8/07, Roland Kaeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Sorry for my cheek, but don't a 1.0-Version mean that every Windows app
> works on Wine?
>
There will never be a point where all Windows apps work in Wine. As
it stands, we have a bigger compatibility goal than current versions
of
Hello
Sorry for my cheek, but don't a 1.0-Version mean that every Windows app works
on Wine?
Regards
Roland
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Wine Developers List
Gesendet: Sonntag, den 7. Oktober 2007, 22:36:41 Uhr
Betreff
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little?
> I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally.
> Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from
> bugzilla because it doesn't do this.
Afaik this is n
I would like to propose this one:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5351
2007/10/7, Karl Relton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I would like consideration given to
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362
>
> I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe mig
Hello!
King InuYasha wrote:
> I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
> a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
> which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think
> would be much better.
There are already a couple too
Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little?
I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally.
Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from
bugzilla because it doesn't do this.
- Dan
--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
> I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as a
> sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, which
> PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think would be
> much
> better.
Audio in wine is still a problematic area. The situation
On 10/7/07, EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb
I see you attached the patch to bug 9023, thanks.
> and I
> did some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to
> activate my copy of microsoft office 2003,
King InuYasha schrieb:
> What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the
> website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing
> interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must
> have happened since then...
>
On Sunday 07 October 2007 22:15:48 King InuYasha wrote:
> What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the
> website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing
> interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must have
> happened since then
What happened to the wine weekly newsletters? the latest issue on the
website is dated May 26, 2007. I am hoping this does not mean nothing
interesting has happened since then, since I am certain something must have
happened since then...
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as a
sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, which
PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think would be much
better.
I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb and I did
some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to activate
my copy of microsoft office 2003, and both means of activating the application
are broken in wine due to bugs 9943 and 9944. Then I tried t
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:02:18AM -0500, Clarence Risher wrote:
> PS: I too have been the victim of heavy handed channel administration
> in #winehq.
If anyone is interested in making #winehq a place that is more
pleasant, I would urge them to try to accomplish what I suggest
in the last paragrap
There has been 1 1/2 month since Lei sent this patch for Greek resource file
for common control and I don't see it in cvs. Why is that???
2007/8/23, Lei Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Apostolos Alexiadis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent several copies of this
> patch, but none of them were in the
Am Sonntag, 7. Oktober 2007 16:44:27 schrieb Joerg Mayer:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:41:10PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report
> > to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007
> >
> > (direct link:
>
> +http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=At
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:41:10PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report
> to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007
>
> (direct link:
>
+http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wineconf-20
+07-julliard.pdf
> )
>
> Feel free
I would like consideration given to
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362
I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe might be quite common among home users
(who may get a copy with their digital camera, and not fork out for full
Photoshop).
The other bug
Can everyone else who gave a presentation put them up on the wiki?
Stefan, Detlev, Kai, Martin
On 10/7/07, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report
> to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007
>
> (direct link:
> http://wiki.winehq
-- Original message --
From: Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Ben Taylor wrote:
> > haven't built wine in a while, and ran into this on Solaris 10:
> >
> > actctx.c:76: error: `version' defined as wrong kind of tag
> > gmake[2]: *** [actctx.o] Error 1
Hi,
I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report
to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007
(direct link:
http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wineconf-2007-julliard.pdf
)
Feel free to upload more slides, and if you are lazy, send them to
me and I will ;)
Ci
I filed a bug for this,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/149260
and Bryce sent me a beta package which works. Solved, I think!
Hi Ben,
Ben Taylor wrote:
> haven't built wine in a while, and ran into this on Solaris 10:
>
> actctx.c:76: error: `version' defined as wrong kind of tag
> gmake[2]: *** [actctx.o] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls/ntdll'
> gmake[1]: *** [ntdll] Error 2
> gm
For reference, the projects from this past year are listed at
http://code.google.com/soc/2007/wine/about.html
--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> This handles failures on "wine" testplatform
> with Gecko not installed.
>
> The testplatform checks might be more generic.
>
> Ciao, Marcus
>
This patch should fix it:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-October/044833.html
Thanks,
Jacek
Dan Kegel kegel.com> writes:
>
> Louis wrote:
> > Ok, here one on my wish-list:
> > All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality.
>
> Hmm. I looked at the 48 bugs in
> http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&component=wine-shdocvw
> briefly, and marked a
Louis wrote:
> Ok, here one on my wish-list:
> All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality.
Hmm. I looked at the 48 bugs in
http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&component=wine-shdocvw
briefly, and marked a few of them that looked important as 1.0. See
On Sunday October 7 2007 01:10, Tsukasa wrote:
> Vitamin banned me today - you can see the full log here. Also I was about
> to say at the end there, if redhat automounts usb sticks.
> http://pastebin.com/mb489dc
I'm sorry but I agree with Vitaliy decision. I don't know you so I'm
judging
31 matches
Mail list logo
