Jeff Latimer wrote:
> Any ideas on what I need to do to get crosstest to work?
>
Problem fixed. When in doubt read the documentation ie. I searched went
to the wiki http://wiki.jswindle.com/index.php/Coding_Hints:Test_Cases
which had a post from Hans.
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>> Can we add in a line at the top saying
>> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
>> just like any other Linux application using your
>> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remo
On Saturday 14 February 2009, Dan Kegel wrote:
> A few months ago, Alexandre started including lists of fixed
> bugs in his release announcements.
> See e.g. http://www.winehq.org/announce/1.1.15, which says
>
> Bugs fixed in 1.1.15:
>5694 Lionhead Black & White 2 demo crashes
>7014 Unha
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Remco wrote:
> Filed a bug with "epiphany-browser":
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/332253
Thanks. I filed one for Konqueror,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase/+bug/332340
-Dan
I have been writing some tests for InetNtop/inet_ntop and placed them in
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c (snip of the code is below) but when I cross
compile I get:
make crosstest
i386-mingw32-gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include-g
-O2 -o sock.cross.o sock.c
i386-mingw32-gcc protoc
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Remco wrote:
> I read the following e-mail on pipermail:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073428.html
>
> Try downloading the PHP attachment from there; it will actually
> execute and give you an HTML page. This could easily be abused!
>
I read the following e-mail on pipermail:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073428.html
Try downloading the PHP attachment from there; it will actually
execute and give you an HTML page. This could easily be abused!
Remco
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html and let me know if it
> > detects your distro properly, I'll fix it up as needed.You're running
>
> Firefox 3 on an unknown dis
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html and let me know if it
> detects your distro properly, I'll fix it up as needed.You're running
Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Windows an unknown CPU!
Firefox 3.0.6 on Windows XP SP3
userAgent
2009/2/21 Dan Kegel :
> Can we add in a line at the top saying
> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> just like any other Linux application using your
> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remove,
> select Wine, and click Apply Changes).
I know some versio
Hi.
I want help you.
I know c glibc and svn.
I don't know git(but i'm leraning) and winapi(i don't know how learn without
windows).
Where my skils will be usefull.
I have StarCraft and i want help you with dib engine but my skils are still
too low (i don't know how patch my git tree with max dib
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> > Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
> >
> > userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
> > Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
> >
> > I don't think you're gonna be ab
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>
> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
> Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
>
> I don't think you're gonna be able to get the distribution name out of
> that... a problem wit
>> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>>
>> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
>> Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
>>
>> I don't think you're gonna be able to get the distribution name out of
>> that... a problem with Epiphany I guess.
Right, same with Ko
And now also to the list:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>
>> Please try again, and paste the entire output page, I've added more info.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>
> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> > and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> > I'll fix it up as needed.
>
> It's probably a more useful test if you also print the repo
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
It's probably a more useful test if you also print the reported user
agent string. (By the way, Dan, could you somehow
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
You're running
Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
Actually: Epiphany 2.24.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 x86-64
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Erich Hoover wrote:
> You could use the HTTP_USER_AGENT environment variable to do a first-order
> attempt. That way for people with Javascript disabled there's at least a
> chance you'll detect their distribution.
Yeah, we could probably do it all in php instea
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:28 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
> > I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
> > can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javasc
Hi Dan,
Firefox 3.1b2 on OpenSolaris 2008.11 returns: 'unknown distribution of
an unknown OS'.
Cheers
Hark
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
>> I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
>> can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
>
> Th
2009/2/20 Dan Kegel :
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
You're runni
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
> >> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> >> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
> >
> > Can we also have a non-Javascript page, pleas
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
>>> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>>> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
>>
>> On Gentoo with www-client/mozilla-firefox (not mozilla-firefox-bin)
>> the pa
2009/2/20 Rein Klazes :
> Hi,
>
> See subject.
>
> Rein.
>
>
>
>
A testcase would be helpful.
--
-Austin
On Freitag 20 Februar 2009, Rein Klazes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See subject.
>
> Rein.
>
Hi,
mostly minor code style comments.
> if( hMenu ) {
> + MENUINFO minfo;
> + MENUITEMINFOW miteminfo;
> POPUPMENU* menu = MENU_GetMenu(hMenu);
> menu->wFlags |= MF_SYSMENU |
For me, it got Gentoo just fine.
using: www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.1_beta2-r1
"You're using Firefox 3.1 on Gentoo Linux!"
--Murph
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> [...]
>> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
>> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
>> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
>
> Can we also have a non-Javascript page, please? People with
> accessibility issues, and crufty old curmudge
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
>> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
>
> On Gentoo with www-client/mozilla-firefox (not mozilla-firefox-bin)
> the page just detects "unknown distribution Linux".
Try it now..
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
Can we also have a non-Javascript page, please? People with
accessibility issues, and crufty old curmudgeons like me who disable
Javascript by default, would apprec
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:28 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
It does not my detect distro version. Can that be done?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
[...]
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
>
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'l
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
> I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
> can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
Thanks!
Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Aric Stewart wrote:
> Ok i am following you but.
>
> James Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Aric Stewart
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>
> .
> .
> .
>>
>> No, I think the patch is wrong in that if you remove the original
>> media and the stored cab
Ok i am following you but.
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Aric Stewart wrote:
>> Hello,
.
.
.
> No, I think the patch is wrong in that if you remove the original
> media and the stored cabs, the install will fail.
By that thinking then the whole function find_published_s
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:47:16AM -0600, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> >
> > Can we add in a line at the top saying
> > "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> > just like any other Linux application using your
> > package
> No argument there, but the thing you want prominently placed is the
> download link, not the thankyou, right?
Oh, sorry; I didn't understand.
I was trying to be honorable on this point by clearly revealing why
that prominent placement was given to us; a truth in advertising
sort of thing.
I ca
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
>>> I think we should also move the text
>>> "This endorsement is the primary recognition that CodeWeavers has
>>> requested in exchange for hosting the Wine web site."
>>> to the bottom of the page, and change it to read
>>> "Thanks to CodeWeav
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Can we add in a line at the top saying
> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> just like any other Linux application using your
> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remove,
> select Wine, and click
>> I think we should also move the text
>> "This endorsement is the primary recognition that CodeWeavers has
>> requested in exchange for hosting the Wine web site."
>> to the bottom of the page, and change it to read
>> "Thanks to CodeWeavers for hosting WineHQ.org".
>
> +1
To be very honest, th
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:37 AM, James Mckenzie
wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>>Sent: Feb 20, 2009 10:32 AM
>>To: Dan Kegel
>>Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
>>Subject: Re: Wine download page usability problem
>>
>>On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we add in a line a
Austin English wrote:
>Sent: Feb 20, 2009 10:32 AM
>To: Dan Kegel
>Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
>Subject: Re: Wine download page usability problem
>
>On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>
>> Can we add in a line at the top saying
>> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be in
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Aric Stewart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> No i never saw the e-mail that you send to Jeremy.
>
> I will admit that i did not dig really deep for this patch as it appeared
> to me that the fix was obvious (there was even a fixme in the code saying we
> needed to do what th
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I got email from a friend who complained how
> hard it was to install wine. Turns out he
> assumed he had to go to winehq.org and
> follow the download instructions there,
> when all he needed to do was do
> Applications / Add/Remove and pick W
I got email from a friend who complained how
hard it was to install wine. Turns out he
assumed he had to go to winehq.org and
follow the download instructions there,
when all he needed to do was do
Applications / Add/Remove and pick Wine.
Can we add in a line at the top saying
"Stable version 1.0
Hi Chris!
> I think I know how to implement this feature of Win32 serial comm, but
> before I attempted I wanted to broadcast my intent to do so. Is
> anyone else working on this, or in the serial.c area that would like
> to discuss it?
No one that I know of is working in this area. Periodicall
you should send one patch per email, dan should have told you that :P
good to see you guys on the project :)
2009/2/20 Adam Stoelting
> Hello,
>
> These are my first patches. I am graduate student at UCLA and am trying to
> help with porting Wine to 64 bit. I haven't seen any Microsoft source
Hello,
No i never saw the e-mail that you send to Jeremy.
I will admit that i did not dig really deep for this patch as it
appeared to me that the fix was obvious (there was even a fixme in the
code saying we needed to do what the installer was asking for)
There are about 4 CAB files
2009/2/20 Hans Leidekker :
> On Friday 20 February 2009 08:38:09 James Hawkins wrote:
>
>> > It would hurt overall performance if we do it at the directory API
>> > level, so the same logic does not apply.
>> >
>>
>> I'm not advocating adding it to the directory API. I'm saying if we
>> don't care
On Thursday 19 February 2009 16:55:20 emiliano esposito wrote:
> Unhandled exception: unimplemented function
> usbd.sys.USBD_GetUSBDIVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7ee2e923)
You can try attached patch
From b7fad82130608126244ba2aee3f91b3337229fb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Morozov
I'm trying to use WKO, it is software which communicates via USB to an
external device (watch/heart rate monitor/bike odometer) using FTDI
drivers. When I plug in the device dmesg tells me it's recognized and
placed on /dev/ttyUSB0. I've put a link to that inside of
.wine/dosdevices/com1. I stil
On Friday 20 February 2009 08:38:09 James Hawkins wrote:
> > It would hurt overall performance if we do it at the directory API
> > level, so the same logic does not apply.
> >
>
> I'm not advocating adding it to the directory API. I'm saying if we
> don't care about it at that level, then we sh
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Francois Gouget wrote:
[...]
> Well, since Cygwin is a Unix platform after a fashion (iirc), I don't
> think you need to check with MSVC (with MinGW it would be different). So
> I think your patch is ok.
You should add a comment in the port.h file saying that this define is
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> > A little bit of explanation would be nice...
>
> I thought the Changelog in the patch would explain enough. MSG_WAITALL
> is not defined on Cygwin when building wininet or winhttp without it.
54 matches
Mail list logo
