Le ven 06/05/2005 à 08:42, Jani Kärkkäinen a écrit :
> Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
>
> >On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:12:01PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> >
> >
> >I wanted to require that you login to edit anyway, it was so easy
> >to forget that I even forgot a few times. Do people want to go back
> >t
Can you post the Balmer image someplace else on the wiki for us
to see? Can you email it me? :-)
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
A few things:
1. We've been attacked Wed by one or two idiots from
Slashdot. They kept replacing the content of the
front page with some silly Balmer images :)
Not a big
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:12:01PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
I wanted to require that you login to edit anyway, it was so easy
to forget that I even forgot a few times. Do people want to go back
to the old way, and allow even not logged in people edit?
New to the list,
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:12:01PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
The slashdotting has passed, I doubt it'll be a problem again. I should
have known better than to directly link to it from the story. D'oh!
Don't worry, it wasn't a big deal, I think it was OK to post to ./
And hey
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:12:01PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> The slashdotting has passed, I doubt it'll be a problem again. I should
> have known better than to directly link to it from the story. D'oh!
Don't worry, it wasn't a big deal, I think it was OK to post to ./
And hey, it was a good serv
On Fri, 06 May 2005 00:45:05 -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
>However, this episode forced me to at least require
>that you sign up before you can edit a page. This
>is probably a good idea anyway, I hope people agree.
The slashdotting has passed, I doubt it'll be a problem again. I sho
A few things:
1. We've been attacked Wed by one or two idiots from
Slashdot. They kept replacing the content of the
front page with some silly Balmer images :)
Not a big deal, since MoinMoin makes it a snap to
revert to an older version.
However, this episode forced me to at least