Francois Gouget wrote:
> Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> [...]
>> Missing MFC42 and other redistributable DLLs is a showstopper for
>> winelib
>> and running windows code on non i386 archtecture...
>
> Well, not quite. If you're going to use Winelib it means that you have
> the source of the application. And i
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
[...]
Missing MFC42 and other redistributable DLLs is a showstopper for winelib
and running windows code on non i386 archtecture...
Well, not quite. If you're going to use Winelib it means that you have
the source of the application. And if it is using the MFC it should mean
Am Freitag, 7. September 2007 10:05:25 schrieb Uwe Bonnes:
> Missing MFC42 and other redistributable DLLs is a showstopper for winelib
> and running windows code on non i386 archtecture...
I think you can compile MFC42 for winelib and other architectures, the source
code is publically accessible(s
> "Dan" == Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dan> Misha wrote:
>> and even my version of Windows 98 is bundled with mfc42.dll, so wine
>> really should provide it too... [our own version, not Microsoft's.]
Dan> Well, sure. Same goes for a lot of things. But since mfc42.
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 06:17 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Misha wrote:
> > and even my version of Windows 98 is bundled with mfc42.dll, so wine really
> > should
> > provide it too... [our own version, not Microsoft's.]
>
> Well, sure. Same goes for a lot of things. But
> since mfc42.dll is a Visu
Misha wrote:
> and even my version of Windows 98 is bundled with mfc42.dll, so wine really
> should
> provide it too... [our own version, not Microsoft's.]
Well, sure. Same goes for a lot of things. But
since mfc42.dll is a Visual C++ runtime file that
has very liberal redistribution terms and