We use bandwidth shaping on *nix. works fine. currently the profile for
one site manages 500+ IP based up and downstream. Its one of our few
home-brew items. Of course, its all open source, so I don't need to
worry about support on this particular item.
John Thomas wrote:
Mark, go over to
We were doing quite a bit with our 3640 but from my experience the box
did not hold up well under load. Be cautious when considering doing
traffic shaping with your 3640. Watch the memory and CPU load closely.
Scriv
John Thomas wrote:
Mark, go over to http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html#du
Mark, go over to http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html#dude
See if it does some/all of what you need.
As for limiting/shaping, your 3640 may do what you need.
John
Mark Nash wrote:
I'm at the point on my network now that I really need to control
unnecessary bandwidth usage. The biggest pro
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Tom Andrews wrote:
I can't say enough about the guys at Imagestream. I'm a proud
customer, host their servers and have put my business in their
hands on more times than I have things to count them on. I've never
I like the Imagestream product as well. It is a really top-n
eless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] P2P & Worm Monitoring/Alerting/Control
Tom Andrews
"Stuart Pierce fa
om Andrews
"Stuart Pierce fan club member"
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:30
Subject: Re: [WISPA] P2P & Worm Monitoring/Alerting/Control
h
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 8:25
PM
Subject: [WISPA] P2P & Worm
Monitoring/Alerting/Control
I'm at the point on my network now that I really
need to control unnecessary bandwidth usage. The biggest problem is the
p2p users with their
I will second that nomination! MikroTik does an outstanding job at
limiting/shaping P2P (and anything else) traffic from shutting it down
completely , setting a "tolerable rate" that allows the users to stay
connected and download what they want as you control "how fast" and
"what time its ok"
Must agree with Butch. MikroTik works well and scales well. It is all
we use for P2P, firewalling, NAT, rate limiting and logging.
Blair Davis
West Michigan Wireless ISP
269-686-8648
Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Mark Nash wrote:
I'm needing to implement a solution that will monit
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Mark Nash wrote:
I'm needing to implement a solution that will monitor, alert on,
and control this type of traffic. Either not pass it or rate-limit
it. I'm interested in solutions that have been implemented,
home-grown, tested, failed, etc.
While there are LOTS of solu
I'm at the point on my network now that I really
need to control unnecessary bandwidth usage. The biggest problem is the
p2p users with their excessive upload, and worms come in a close
second.
My network is comprised of a Cisco 3640, Cisco
C4840G L3 switch for segmenting, and Dell 3324 m
11 matches
Mail list logo
