Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40436: /trunk-1.6/ /trunk-1.6/debian/: wireshark-common.files /trunk-1.6/epan/: Makefile.am /trunk-1.6/: make-version.pl /trunk-1.6/wiretap/: Makefile.am

2012-01-12 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 12, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > Thanks for the pointer and the following explanations. Now that I feel I *may* > have understood the numbering, I have a new proposal/question: > As we strive to keep our libs downward compatible inside a stable release > (i.e. the newer libs sho

[Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [FOSDEM] Meeting rooms

2012-01-12 Thread Gerald Combs
Of the developers attending FOSDEM, who can run fastest? Original Message Subject: [FOSDEM] Meeting rooms Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:08:17 +0100 From: Pascal Bleser To: fos...@lists.fosdem.org This year, we will provide two meeting rooms (aka "BoF rooms") in the AW building. The

Re: [Wireshark-dev] pcapng, must opt_comment string be?0-terminated?

2012-01-12 Thread Martin Kaiser
Thus wrote Chris Maynard (chris.mayn...@gtech.com): > To avoid the possibility of reading past the end of option_content in > the case when oh.option_length > sizeof(option_content), I think it > would be safer to do this instead: > wblock->data.packet.opt_comment = g_strndup(option_content, > MI

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5

2012-01-12 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 12, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Gerald Combs wrote: > Is ACC available for Windows or OS X? I'd rather keep make-version.pl > cross-platform if possible. This: http://forge.ispras.ru/projects/abi-compliance-checker/repository/entry/trunk/INSTALL.txt seems to suggest that the latest versi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40436: /trunk-1.6/ /trunk-1.6/debian/: wireshark-common.files /trunk-1.6/epan/: Makefile.am /trunk-1.6/: make-version.pl /trunk-1.6/wiretap/: Makefile.am

2012-01-12 Thread Joerg Mayer
> >>> Why not mimic the Wireshark version? so instead of 1:6:0 use 1:6:4 for > >>> wireshark > >>> 1.6.4? Would make it trivial to generate the library version number. > >> > >> http://www.sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_91.html Thanks for the pointer and the following explanations. No

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5

2012-01-12 Thread Gerald Combs
On 1/12/12 9:33 AM, Balint Reczey wrote: > On 01/12/2012 06:20 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: >> On 1/12/12 9:06 AM, Gerald Combs wrote: >>> On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote: >>> I'm not sure that it is the proper approach. We don't have to update the library version if there is no change

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5

2012-01-12 Thread Balint Reczey
On 01/12/2012 06:06 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote: I'm not sure that it is the proper approach. We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in the lib. The libtool documentation says "If the library source code has changed at all since t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5

2012-01-12 Thread Balint Reczey
On 01/12/2012 06:20 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: On 1/12/12 9:06 AM, Gerald Combs wrote: On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote: I'm not sure that it is the proper approach. We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in the lib. The libtool documentation says "If the libra

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5

2012-01-12 Thread Gerald Combs
On 1/12/12 9:06 AM, Gerald Combs wrote: > On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote: > >> I'm not sure that it is the proper approach. >> We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in the >> lib. > > The libtool documentation says "If the library source code has changed > at

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5

2012-01-12 Thread Gerald Combs
On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote: > I'm not sure that it is the proper approach. > We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in the > lib. The libtool documentation says "If the library source code has changed at all since the last update, then increment revision (‘

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5

2012-01-12 Thread Balint Reczey
On 01/11/2012 08:37 AM, Harper wrote: Balint Reczey wrote in news:4f09f7b3.2000...@ericsson.com: Hi, I have run tools/git-compare-abis.sh on latest master-1.6 (wireshark-1.6.4-21-ga6c3642). The ABI is almost totally stable [1], which is very good sign for plugin developers and for anyone usin

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5

2012-01-12 Thread Balint Reczey
On 01/11/2012 06:04 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: On 1/10/12 2:29 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: On 1/10/12 2:09 PM, Balint Reczey wrote: diff --git a/debian/wireshark-common.files b/debian/wireshark-common.files index 41341be..4403c04 100644 --- a/debian/wireshark-common.files +++ b/debian/wireshark-commo

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment

2012-01-12 Thread Graham Bloice
> -Original Message- > From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- > boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer > Sent: 12 January 2012 00:19 > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment > > On Wed, Jan 11,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40436: /trunk-1.6/ /trunk-1.6/debian/: wireshark-common.files /trunk-1.6/epan/: Makefile.am /trunk-1.6/: make-version.pl /trunk-1.6/wiretap/: Makefile.am

2012-01-12 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:35 AM, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2012, at 4:48 PM, Sam Roberts wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&rev

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40436: /trunk-1.6/ /trunk-1.6/debian/: wireshark-common.files /trunk-1.6/epan/: Makefile.am /trunk-1.6/: make-version.pl /trunk-1.6/wiretap/: Makefile.am

2012-01-12 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 11, 2012, at 4:48 PM, Sam Roberts wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote: >>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40436 >>> User: gerald >>> Date: 2012/01/11 09:00 AM