Commit 279840d5ea ("x86/boot: install trap handlers much earlier on
boot"), perhaps not really intentionally, removed this check. Add it
back,
- preventing it to trigger before any output is set up,
- accompanying it with a (weaker, due to its open coding of what
get_stack_bottom() does) build ti
On 14/11/16 13:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Commit 279840d5ea ("x86/boot: install trap handlers much earlier on
> boot"), perhaps not really intentionally, removed this check. Add it
No - that was deliberate. The check isn't useful (see below).
> back,
> - preventing it to trigger before any output
>>> On 14.11.16 at 14:45, wrote:
> On 14/11/16 13:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
>> @@ -643,6 +643,11 @@ void load_system_tables(void)
>> .limit = (IDT_ENTRIES * sizeof(idt_entry_t)) - 1,
>> };
>>
>> +/* Bottom-o
>>> On 14.11.16 at 15:24, wrote:
On 14.11.16 at 14:45, wrote:
>> The BUILD_BUG_ON() is useful to retain, but I would suggest making
>> get_stack_bottom() a static inline and putting the BUILD_BUG_ON() there.
>
> I would agree if we were to not add back the BUG_ON(), but as
> per above I'm n
On 14/11/16 14:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.11.16 at 14:45, wrote:
>> On 14/11/16 13:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
>>> @@ -643,6 +643,11 @@ void load_system_tables(void)
>>> .limit = (IDT_ENTRIES * sizeof(idt_entry_t
>>> On 14.11.16 at 15:38, wrote:
> On 14/11/16 14:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.11.16 at 14:45, wrote:
>>> On 14/11/16 13:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
@@ -643,6 +643,11 @@ void load_system_tables(void)
.
On 14/11/16 15:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.11.16 at 15:38, wrote:
>> On 14/11/16 14:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.11.16 at 14:45, wrote:
On 14/11/16 13:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
> @@ -643,6 +643,11 @@ vo
>>> On 14.11.16 at 17:38, wrote:
> On 14/11/16 15:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.11.16 at 15:38, wrote:
>>> On 14/11/16 14:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 14.11.16 at 14:45, wrote:
> On 14/11/16 13:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/
On 14/11/16 16:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.11.16 at 17:38, wrote:
>> On 14/11/16 15:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.11.16 at 15:38, wrote:
On 14/11/16 14:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.11.16 at 14:45, wrote:
>> On 14/11/16 13:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arc
>>> On 15.11.16 at 11:26, wrote:
> On 14/11/16 16:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.11.16 at 17:38, wrote:
>>> On 14/11/16 15:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 14.11.16 at 15:38, wrote:
> On 14/11/16 14:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.11.16 at 14:45, wrote:
>>> On 14/11/16 13:25
10 matches
Mail list logo