On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 11:22 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer
> supported.
> Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I
> always have
> to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue.
>
> We should add rows to
So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer supported.
Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I always have
to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue.
We should add rows to http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features right
under Initial
>>> On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote:
> So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer supported.
> Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I always have
> to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue.
>
> We should add rows to
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 04:45 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote:
> > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer
> > supported.
> > Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I always
> > have
> > to ask if
>>> On 07.01.16 at 13:00, wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 04:45 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote:
>> > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer
>> > supported.
>> > Neither am I ever confident
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 12:44 +, Lars Kurth wrote:
> > On 7 Jan 2016, at 11:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > > > > On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote:
> > > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer
> > > supported.
> > > Neither am I