Re: [Xen-devel] Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)

2016-01-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 11:22 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer > supported. > Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I > always have > to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue. > > We should add rows to

[Xen-devel] Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)

2016-01-07 Thread Ian Campbell
So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer supported. Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I always have to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue. We should add rows to http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features right under Initial

[Xen-devel] Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)

2016-01-07 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote: > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer supported. > Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I always have > to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue. > > We should add rows to

Re: [Xen-devel] Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)

2016-01-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 04:45 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote: > > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer > > supported. > > Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I always > > have > > to ask if

Re: [Xen-devel] Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)

2016-01-07 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 07.01.16 at 13:00, wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 04:45 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote: >> > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer >> > supported. >> > Neither am I ever confident

Re: [Xen-devel] Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)

2016-01-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 12:44 +, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 7 Jan 2016, at 11:45, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote: > > > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer > > > supported. > > > Neither am I