On 11.05.2023 22:22, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 11.05.2023 15:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:21 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.05.2023 19:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:26 AM Jan
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 11.05.2023 15:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:21 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10.05.2023 19:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:26 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 01.05.2023 21:30,
On 11.05.2023 15:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:21 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 10.05.2023 19:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:26 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:21 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 10.05.2023 19:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:26 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> >>> Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp parameters. These match the
> >>> hardware
On 10.05.2023 19:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:26 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>>> Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp parameters. These match the
>>> hardware rather closely.
>>>
>>> We need the features bitmask to indicated
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:26 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp parameters. These match the
> > hardware rather closely.
> >
> > We need the features bitmask to indicated fields supported by the actual
> > hardware.
>
On 08.05.2023 12:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>> Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp parameters. These match the
>> hardware rather closely.
>>
>> We need the features bitmask to indicated fields supported by the actual
>> hardware.
>>
>> The use of
On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp parameters. These match the
> hardware rather closely.
>
> We need the features bitmask to indicated fields supported by the actual
> hardware.
>
> The use of uint8_t parameters matches the hardware size.
Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp parameters. These match the
hardware rather closely.
We need the features bitmask to indicated fields supported by the actual
hardware.
The use of uint8_t parameters matches the hardware size. uint32_t
entries grows the sysctl_t past the build