[Xen-devel] [PATCH v18 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq servers rather than a list

2018-03-22 Thread Paul Durrant
A subsequent patch will remove the current implicit limitation on creation of ioreq servers which is due to the allocation of gfns for the ioreq structures and buffered ioreq ring. It will therefore be necessary to introduce an explicit limit and, since this limit should be small, it simplifies th

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v18 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq servers rather than a list

2018-03-26 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 22.03.18 at 12:55, wrote: > v18: > - non-trivial re-base. > - small modification to FOR_EACH... macro to iterate backwards, to main- >tain a previous undocumented but useful semantic that secondary >emulators are selected in favour of qemu. If this is intentional (and necessary),

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v18 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq servers rather than a list

2018-03-28 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 26 March 2018 12:22 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq > servers rather than a list > > >>> On 22.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v18 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq servers rather than a list

2018-03-28 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > Of Paul Durrant > Sent: 28 March 2018 15:44 > To: 'Jan Beulich' > Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH